WathagaCloud · Kowa Collaboration

Data hub · Knowledge base

Local Indigenous policy issues, and what would work

60 issues and 231 practical solutions drawn from the Social Justice Report 2025, the Productivity Commission's Closing the Gap data and Kowa's UMEL practice, set against the SDGs, UNDRIP and what other countries have done.
Snapshot of 31 October 2026 · See live data in the app

Indigenous peoples, the SDGs and UNDRIP

How Australia compares

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, Bolivia and South Africa on Indigenous rights in law and on outcomes. The rights score is a Wathaga assessment out of 18; see the global map for each country's world ranks.

SDGsOnly two SDG targets name Indigenous peoples

Target 2.3 (incomes of small-scale food producers) and target 4.5 (equal access to education) are the only SDG targets that mention Indigenous peoples, and the global indicator list has no Indigenous-specific indicator. Countries have to disaggregate their own data to see Indigenous outcomes.

IISD SDG Knowledge Hub
SDGsAustralia goes further than the SDGs require

Closing the Gap sets 19 quantified Indigenous-specific targets with independent annual assessment by the Productivity Commission. Wathaga maps each target to SDGs and UNDRIP articles in the policy matrix, which is more than the UN framework asks for.

Productivity Commission
SDGsUNDRIP is the rights standard the SDGs lack

The SDGs promise to leave no one behind but say little about self-determination, land or free, prior and informed consent. UNDRIP fills that gap, which is why the Social Justice Report 2025 asks for a national UNDRIP implementation plan (recommendation 7) and an UNDRIP test for all proposals (recommendation 13).

AHRC Social Justice Report 2025
AUSAustralia
World leader on outcome targets and monitoring; last on legal recognition.
9/18
  • 19 Closing the Gap targets with independent annual assessment; in July 2026 one target was met and three were on track, while adult imprisonment, out-of-home care, suicide and early childhood development were worsening. (Productivity Commission)
  • Life expectancy gap of 8.8 years for males and 8.1 years for females (2020–22). (Productivity Commission)
  • No national UNDRIP law, no constitutional recognition after the 2023 referendum, and ILO Convention 169 not ratified; the Social Justice Report 2025 recommends all three be addressed (recommendations 7, 13 and 22). (AHRC Social Justice Report 2025)
CANCanada
UNDRIP in law with an action plan; implementation has slowed.
13/18
  • The UNDRIP Act (2021) and a 2023–28 Action Plan with 181 measures; the fifth annual progress report (August 2026) acknowledges concern that implementation has slowed. (Department of Justice Canada)
  • Indigenous adults were 33.2% of people in custody in six provinces but 4.3% of adults there (2023/24), about ten times the non-Indigenous rate. (Statistics Canada via Turtle Island News)
  • 38 long-term drinking water advisories remained in 36 First Nations communities in June 2026, after the March 2026 goal to end them was missed. (Indigenous Services Canada)
NZLNew Zealand
Strongest land redress through Treaty settlements; the government has stepped back from UNDRIP.
10/18
  • The coalition government stopped work on the He Puapua UNDRIP plan and states that UNDRIP has no binding legal effect. (The Spinoff)
  • The Treaty Principles Bill was defeated 112 to 11 at its second reading in April 2025. (Wikipedia summary of parliamentary record)
  • Māori were 52.3% of people in prison (November 2025) against about 17.8% of the population; Māori life expectancy was 73.7 years for males and 78.0 for females (2022–24). (Waatea News; RNZ (Stats NZ))
BRABrazil
Constitutional land rights and ILO 169; contested in Congress and on the ground.
13/18
  • The 2022 census counted 1.69 million Indigenous people; a Ministry of Indigenous Peoples was created in 2023. (IBGE via Gazeta SP)
  • The Supreme Court struck down the marco temporal land-claim cut-off for a second time in December 2025, but the dispute continues, including a proposed constitutional amendment. (Courthouse News)
  • Indigenous infant mortality was 31 per 1,000 births in 2022, more than double the non-Indigenous rate. (Brasil de Fato (Ministry of Health data))
BOLBolivia
Strongest formal framework; little independent outcome monitoring.
14/18
ZAFSouth Africa
Voted for UNDRIP; no national Indigenous recognition, data or targets.
3/18
  • The Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act was found invalid in 2023; the Constitutional Court has given Parliament until 29 May 2027 to fix it. (IOL)
  • Land restitution covers dispossession after 1913 only, leaving most Khoi and San losses outside the scheme. (Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994 (general knowledge, not re-checked October 2026))
AUSLessons for Australia4
  • Legislate UNDRIP with a co-designed national action plan and annual public reporting, as Canada has (SJR 2025 recommendation 7).
  • Ratify ILO Convention 169, as Brazil, Bolivia and most of Latin America have (SJR 2025 recommendation 22).
  • Use settlement-style land redress and well-funded Prescribed Bodies Corporate, drawing on New Zealand's Treaty settlements (SJR 2025 recommendations 21 and 23).
  • Keep and strengthen Australia's own advantage: independent annual monitoring of quantified targets, extended to the Priority Reforms and to community-defined measures (SJR 2025 recommendations 11, 12 and 15).

Social Justice Report 2025

Findings and recommendations

The Commissioner's Blueprint for a fair and just future rests on five priority areas, delivered through 25 recommendations. Each is linked to register records and evidence in the Data hub.

Increasing First Peoples participation5 recs

Representative structures, agreement-making and truth-telling that give First Peoples a full say in decisions.

  • 2. National representative mechanism
  • 3. Makarrata Commission for truth-telling and agreement-making
  • 4. Public education alongside truth-telling
  • 5. Culturally safe, Indigenous-designed schooling
  • 6. Stolen wages reparation schemes
Promoting the full enjoyment of rights2 recs

Enforceable protections: a National Human Rights Framework and Human Rights Act, UNDRIP implementation and the National Anti-Racism Framework.

  • 7. Human Rights Act and UNDRIP implementation plan
  • 8. Fund participation in human rights forums
Fostering systemic integrity and accountability7 recs

Systems redesigned to prevent harm: independent oversight, Indigenous data sovereignty, fiscal accountability and compliance.

  • 9. Commissioner observer status in Closing the Gap
  • 10. Needs-based, long-term funding for ACCOs
  • 11. Independent audits of Indigenous expenditure
  • 12. Binding data agreements with Indigenous data sovereignty
  • 13. UNDRIP test in Cabinet and Parliamentary handbooks
  • 14. Adopt the National Anti-Racism Framework
  • 15. Rights-based performance conditions in funding to states
Rebuilding the village1 rec

Sustained investment in culture, good governance, just laws, respectful relationships and healing.

  • 16. Long-term funding for community-led rebuilding
Assuring access to justice9 recs

Preventing harm in child protection, youth and criminal legal systems, culturally safe services, accountability for deaths in custody, and land justice.

  • 17. Medicare and PBS for people in custody
  • 18. National child safety and youth justice standards
  • 19. ALRC inquiry into deaths in custody investigations
  • 20. Youth Justice Media Code of Practice
  • 21. Native Title Act reform
  • 22. Ratify ILO Convention 169
  • 23. Fund Prescribed Bodies Corporate in perpetuity
  • 24. First Peoples advisory group on native title reform
  • 25. Stronger cultural heritage protection

Knowledge base

Issues, evidence and solutions

29 issues sit on Closing the Gap targets that are currently getting worse. Filter by theme, by who should lead, or by how soon it can start. Coloured chips show each target's live national assessment.

60 issues · 231 matching solutions

Justice, policing and safety · kb-001Raising the minimum age of criminal responsibilityT11T12SJR 184 solutions

In most Australian jurisdictions children as young as 10 can still be charged, arrested and detained, well below the international benchmark of 14. Recent law changes have moved some jurisdictions backwards, and First Nations children are the most affected. Early criminalisation pulls children into a system that research links to worse health and more offending.

Evidence
  • At the time of writing only the ACT set the minimum age at 14; Victoria had moved to 12, while Queensland, NSW, WA, Tasmania and the NT sat at 10, with the NT having reversed its rise to 12 in October 2024. (SJR 2025, p. 415)
  • The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child recommends a minimum age of at least 14 and advises states never to lower an age once set. (SJR 2025, p. 415)
  • Communities consulted for the report consistently called for the age to be raised, saying children under 14 lack the developmental capacity to be held criminally responsible. (SJR 2025, p. 86)
  • The chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child publicly criticised the NT decision to return the age to 10 as contrary to the Convention. (SJR 2025, p. 419)
Solutions
Legislate a national minimum age of 14

Amend Commonwealth criminal law to set the age at 14 with no carve-outs, as a national floor that states and territories are funded and expected to match.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Match the age of 14 in state and territory law

Raise the age to 14 in every jurisdiction, keep the doli incapax safeguard for older children, and set a later minimum age for detention.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 415
Build community-run responses for children under 14

Redirect funds from detention to ACCO-led family support, health, disability and education responses for children who would otherwise be charged.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Track the effect of raising the age with community indicators

Co-design indicators with ACCOs (school connection, family wellbeing, contact with police) so communities can show what happens when children are diverted rather than charged.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Minimum age of criminal responsibility in each jurisdiction (law in force)
  • Children aged 10–13 entering youth detention for the first time
  • Young people 10–17 in detention per 10,000 (PC target 11)

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can host community-owned dashboards that follow children diverted under a higher age, using indicators communities define and keeping identifiable data under Indigenous data governance.

UNDRIP articles 7, 17, 21, 22 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-002Ending youth detention and over-use of remandT11T7SJR 18SJR 164 solutions

First Nations young people are detained at many times the rate of other young people, and most of those in detention have not been sentenced. Tougher bail and sentencing laws and new detention centres are expanding a system that the evidence says is costly and makes reoffending more likely. Prevention, diversion and family support are under-funded by comparison.

Evidence
  • In 2023–24 about 26 in every 10,000 First Nations young people aged 10–17 were in detention on an average day, roughly 26 times the rate for non-Indigenous young people. (SJR 2025, p. 409)
  • An estimated 74% of children in detention were unsentenced and on remand, rising to around 90% in Queensland and 99% in the NT. (SJR 2025, p. 409)
  • Over a third (34.7%) of First Nations young people in detention in 2023–24 were aged just 10–13 when they first entered detention. (SJR 2025, p. 411)
  • Several governments are committing large sums to new youth detention facilities, which the report argues would deliver more if spent on prevention and family support. (SJR 2025, p. 417)
  • The national rate of young people in detention was 25.7 per 10,000, with no change against the target. (PC 2026, Target 11)
Solutions
Make detention a genuine last resort again

Restore last-resort and bail-presumption principles for children, and reverse "adult time" sentencing changes that conflict with children's rights.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 412
Shift detention capital budgets to prevention

Redirect funds earmarked for new youth prisons into early intervention, family support and diversion run by Aboriginal community-controlled organisations.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Fund community bail and supported accommodation

Resource ACCO-run bail support and safe housing so children are not remanded simply because they have nowhere stable to go.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (bail support and diversion programs cited in SJR p. 419)
Philanthropic co-investment in youth-led diversion

Co-fund multi-year, Aboriginal-led youth programs and mentoring with flexible money that governments can later scale.

Philanthropy and business1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (justice reinvestment, SJR p. 430)
Measures to track
  • Young people 10–17 in detention per 10,000 (PC target 11)
  • Share of young people in detention who are unsentenced
  • Proportion of first-time detainees aged 10–13
  • Funding for ACCO-led youth diversion compared with detention spending

How Wathaga can help. Communities can use Wathaga to compare spending on detention with investment in local diversion and to report youth outcomes they value, strengthening the case for reinvestment.

UNDRIP articles 7, 17, 21, 22 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-003Safe detention: OPCAT oversight and no solitary confinementT11T10T14SJR 184 solutions

Australia ratified OPCAT in 2017 but several jurisdictions have not set up independent inspection bodies, and no jurisdiction bans solitary confinement of children. Children report long lockdowns, isolation and being held in adult watchhouses, and restraint devices banned after a royal commission have been reintroduced in one jurisdiction. Without independent monitoring, harm continues unseen.

Evidence
  • NSW, Queensland and Victoria had not designated National Preventive Mechanisms under OPCAT, and no jurisdiction prohibits solitary confinement of children. (SJR 2025, p. 402)
  • A WA court found three young people had been unlawfully isolated for a combined 167 days in 2023. (SJR 2025, p. 402)
  • Children in detention face overcrowding, repeated lockdowns and up to 23 hours a day in cells, and some are held for long periods in police watchhouses with adults. (SJR 2025, p. 418)
  • NT amendments restored spit hoods in youth detention and removed the detention-as-last-resort principle. (SJR 2025, p. 414)
Solutions
Legislate enforceable national detention standards

Pass Commonwealth legislation giving effect to OPCAT and the Mandela Rules, with enforceable minimum standards for all places of detention.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Designate and fund preventive mechanisms

Every jurisdiction should designate, fund and empower an independent inspection body and adopt the Commission's OPCAT road map.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 402
Ban solitary confinement and spit hoods for children

Prohibit isolation of children and the use of spit hoods in law, with public reporting of any restrictive practice.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
First Nations-led visiting and monitoring

Fund Aboriginal community organisations and Elders to visit detained young people and feed observations into independent inspection reports.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (community visitor schemes)
Measures to track
  • Jurisdictions with a designated and funded OPCAT National Preventive Mechanism
  • Recorded episodes of isolation of children (hours per episode)
  • Use of restraint devices on children in custody

How Wathaga can help. A community-controlled monitoring log in Wathaga could let Elders and visiting organisations record and aggregate concerns safely, giving independent inspectors community-sourced evidence.

UNDRIP articles 7, 22, 40 · SDGs 16 · Priority Reforms 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-004Ending adult over-incarceration and remandT10T9aT9bSJR 18SJR 154 solutions

First Nations adults are imprisoned at rising rates and a large share are held on remand awaiting trial or sentence. Over-policing, bail rules that penalise people without stable housing, and limited reintegration support compound one another. Most First Nations people have never been imprisoned, so this is a system problem rather than a community trait.

Evidence
  • At 30 June 2024, 2,304 per 100,000 First Nations adults were in prison, up from 2,042 in 2023 and 1,906 in 2019; First Nations people were over 35% of adult prisoners while about 3% of the population. (SJR 2025, p. 397)
  • Around 44% of First Nations people in prison nationally were unsentenced, and people without secure housing or bail money are more likely to be held. (SJR 2025, p. 397)
  • Remand numbers nearly doubled over a decade while sentenced numbers barely moved, and Indigenous people made up 61% of the rise in unsentenced prisoners. (SJR 2025, p. 398)
  • A NSW study of 2,731 people in prison identified eight social determinants of justice, including out-of-home care, early police contact, unsupported disability and unstable housing. (SJR 2025, p. 404)
  • The adult imprisonment rate was about 2,500 per 100,000 and the target is worsening. (PC 2026, Target 10)
Solutions
Reform bail and remand settings

Review bail laws so lack of housing or money is not a reason for remand, and fund bail accommodation and support delivered by Aboriginal organisations.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 397
Tie Commonwealth justice funding to reducing incarceration

Make Commonwealth funding to states conditional on showing spending is reducing incarceration and building community-based alternatives.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 15
Culturally safe reintegration support

Fund ACCO-led post-release programs covering housing, health, work and reconnection with family and Country.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 398
Address the social determinants of justice together

Use place-based partnerships to coordinate housing, health, disability and education responses for people at highest risk of imprisonment.

ACCOs and communitieslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (place-based and justice reinvestment approaches)
Measures to track
  • Adult imprisonment rate per 100,000 (PC target 10)
  • Proportion of First Nations people in prison who are unsentenced
  • Return to prison within two years of release
  • Availability of ACCO-run bail and post-release support places

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help justice groups bring together local data on remand, release and support services, so communities can see where the pipeline into prison starts and argue for local alternatives.

UNDRIP articles 2, 7, 40 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-005First Nations women and the justice systemT10T13T12SJR 18SJR 194 solutions

First Nations women are the fastest-growing prison population and are often mothers, grandmothers and carers whose imprisonment harms whole families. Many have histories of trauma and violence, and some are misidentified as perpetrators when they seek help for family violence. Women have also died in police custody and during arrest.

Evidence
  • First Nations women are described as the fastest-growing prison population and are estimated to be up to 25 times more likely to be imprisoned than non-Indigenous women. (SJR 2025, p. 398)
  • A growing number of First Nations women have died in custody, many in police watchhouses or during arrest. (SJR 2025, p. 398)
  • Submissions reported that police responses to family violence often end with First Nations women wrongly treated as perpetrators and criminalised. (SJR 2025, p. 84)
Solutions
Specialist women's legal and support services

Fund First Nations women's legal services and ACCO family violence services to support women before, during and after contact with police and courts.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 396
Fix misidentification in family violence policing

Train and audit police on primary-aggressor identification, with Aboriginal women's organisations involved in review of cases.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 84
Keep mothers and children together

Expand non-custodial sentencing and residential options that let women stay with their children and connected to community.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (community-based sentencing options for mothers)
Women-led healing programs on Country

Support Aboriginal women's organisations to run healing and reintegration programs designed by women with lived experience.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Measures to track
  • Imprisonment rate of First Nations women per 100,000
  • Deaths of First Nations women in police and prison custody
  • Women supported by First Nations women's legal services

How Wathaga can help. Women's organisations could use Wathaga to collect stories and outcomes on their own terms, building evidence for women-led justice responses without handing control of sensitive data to government.

UNDRIP articles 7, 21, 22 · SDGs 5, 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-006Preventing deaths in custody and independent investigationsT10T11T14SJR 19SJR 184 solutions

More than 600 First Nations people have died in custody since the 1991 Royal Commission, and no one has been held criminally responsible. Families have little confidence when police investigate police, and coroners repeatedly find deaths were preventable. The report calls for a national inquiry into investigation practice and independent complaint pathways for families.

Evidence
  • Since the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody reported in 1991, more than 600 First Nations people have died in custody and no person has been held criminally responsible. (SJR 2025, p. 400)
  • A key failing since the Royal Commission is the lack of independent investigation of police conduct in deaths and critical incidents. (SJR 2025, p. 401)
  • First Nations communities have little faith in police investigating their own members, and a recent NT inquest heard evidence of racism within the police force. (SJR 2025, p. 424)
  • Recent coronial findings judged several deaths preventable, citing failures in custodial health care and in de-escalation and cultural training. (SJR 2025, p. 425)
Solutions
ALRC inquiry into custody death investigations

Refer an inquiry to the Australian Law Reform Commission on best-practice police and coronial investigations, national minimum standards and a national investigative mechanism.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 19
Independent complaint process for families

Create an independent, culturally safe pathway for families to raise concerns about investigations and to be kept informed.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 19
Implement coronial recommendations with public reporting

Require agencies to respond publicly to every coronial recommendation on a custody death and report progress until it is implemented.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 426
Family-led support and advocacy

Fund Aboriginal organisations to support families through inquests and to lead community responses after a death.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (family support in inquests, SJR p. 204 discussion of Black witnessing)
Measures to track
  • Deaths of First Nations people in police and prison custody per year
  • Share of custody deaths investigated by a body independent of the agency involved
  • Coronial recommendations implemented within two years

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga could host a community-maintained tracker of coronial and Royal Commission recommendations, giving families and advocates a shared, transparent record of what has and has not been done.

UNDRIP articles 2, 7, 40 · SDGs 16 · Priority Reforms 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-007Equal health care for people in custodyT1T10T14SJR 173 solutions

People in prison cannot use Medicare or the PBS, creating a separate and often lower standard of health care. Coroners have linked failures in prison health care to preventable deaths of First Nations people. Integrating Aboriginal community-controlled health services into prison health is a practical step toward cultural safety and continuity of care.

Evidence
  • Prisoners are excluded from Medicare and the PBS, entrenching a two-tier system that coroners have linked to preventable deaths. (SJR 2025, p. 403)
  • In one recent case a coroner recommended that Aboriginal health organisations be integrated into prison health services to make care culturally safe. (SJR 2025, p. 425)
  • A health justice partnership told the Commission that prison health systems sit apart from public health and largely escape scrutiny. (SJR 2025, p. 127)
Solutions
Open Medicare and PBS to people in custody

Grant the ministerial exemption or legislative change needed so people in custody can access Medicare services and PBS medicines.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 17
ACCHO in-reach into prisons

Contract Aboriginal community-controlled health services to deliver primary and mental health care inside prisons and youth detention.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 425
Continuity of care on release

Link people leaving custody to an ACCHO before release, with medicines and appointments in place.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (throughcare models)
Measures to track
  • People in custody with access to Medicare/PBS-equivalent care
  • Prisons with ACCHO in-reach services
  • People released with a confirmed primary-care appointment

How Wathaga can help. ACCHOs delivering in-reach could use Wathaga to monitor continuity-of-care outcomes they define, demonstrating impact for long-term contracts.

UNDRIP articles 21, 24 · SDGs 3, 16 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-008Fair policing and police accountabilityT10T11T18SJR 19SJR 144 solutions

Communities describe over-policing, racial profiling and charges that are later dropped, alongside slow or poor responses when they need help. Complaints systems are often inaccessible and lack independence, which erodes trust. Initial contact with police shapes every later stage of the justice system.

Evidence
  • In every community engagement people raised over-policing, inexperienced officers and unjustified charges, often later dropped, that criminalise young people. (SJR 2025, p. 82)
  • Over-policing at first contact leads to higher charge rates, more bail refusals and longer remand, compounding at each stage. (SJR 2025, p. 397)
  • A WA Aboriginal legal service called for an independent, impartial police complaints body, noting current mechanisms are culturally unsafe and lack enforcement powers. (SJR 2025, p. 89)
  • An NT inquest into a police shooting recommended anti-racism measures, better complaint handling and more investment in youth and community services. (SJR 2025, p. 426)
Solutions
Independent police complaints bodies

Establish civilian oversight bodies with power to investigate police conduct, including First Nations investigators and culturally safe intake.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 89
Anti-racism audits of police services

Apply the National Anti-Racism Framework to policing through external audits, de-escalation training and published results.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 14
Community patrols and local justice groups

Resource community-controlled night patrols and justice groups as first responders that reduce unnecessary police contact.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (community patrols and law and justice groups)
Publish policing data by Indigenous status

Report stops, searches, move-on orders, charges withdrawn and use of force by Indigenous status so communities can test fairness.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 12
Measures to track
  • Complaints against police by First Nations people and share independently investigated
  • Charges against young people later withdrawn or dismissed
  • Community trust in police (community-run survey)

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can combine community survey data on trust and safety with published policing data, letting communities hold local commands to account using evidence they control.

UNDRIP articles 2, 7, 40 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-009Independent monitoring of Royal Commission and justice commitmentsT10T11SJR 18SJR 154 solutions

Many of the 339 Royal Commission recommendations remain unimplemented after more than three decades, and coordinated national follow-up has faded. Governments report activities rather than results, so public reporting alone has not changed behaviour. The report proposes an independent monitor and funding consequences tied to justice targets.

Evidence
  • The Royal Commission made 339 recommendations; many were never implemented and imprisonment rates have kept rising. (SJR 2025, p. 400)
  • Without a systemic monitoring body there is little visibility of progress, and responsibility has been left to states with little federal oversight. (SJR 2025, p. 423)
  • The 2025 independent review of Closing the Gap found implementation plans list many actions without showing how they improve outcomes. (SJR 2025, p. 426)
  • The report proposes that Commonwealth funding be reduced, redirected or made conditional where state policies push incarceration up, and rewarded where progress is shown. (SJR 2025, p. 427)
Solutions
Create an independent RCIADIC and Closing the Gap monitor

Establish and resource an independent function to audit, publicly report on and escalate non-compliance with Royal Commission and justice commitments.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Use funding levers for justice outcomes

Build justice-target performance requirements and consequences into Commonwealth funding agreements with states.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 15
Strengthen the Justice Policy Partnership

Give the Closing the Gap Justice Policy Partnership access to audit findings and authority to recommend redirection of funds.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 427
Community scorecards on justice commitments

Support communities to publish their own scorecards on local implementation of justice commitments.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: sjr2025 p. 127
Measures to track
  • Royal Commission recommendations fully implemented, by jurisdiction
  • Existence and resourcing of an independent monitoring body
  • Funding agreements containing justice-target performance requirements

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can provide the community-facing scorecard layer, tracking commitments against community-defined measures and making progress visible to everyone.

UNDRIP articles 38, 40 · SDGs 16, 17 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Justice, policing and safety · kb-010Justice reinvestment and community-led alternatives to custodyT10T11T7SJR 18SJR 164 solutions

The main drivers of incarceration sit outside the justice system, in poverty, housing, school disengagement and health. Community-led justice reinvestment and on-Country alternatives to custody have shown strong results where they are trusted and resourced. Funding is still small compared with spending on prisons and police.

Evidence
  • The ALRC Pathways to Justice inquiry found the major drivers of First Nations incarceration lie in poverty, family violence, housing, schooling and health, and recommended justice reinvestment. (SJR 2025, p. 419)
  • The Commonwealth was funding 28 of 30 community-led justice reinvestment initiatives through a $79 million national program. (SJR 2025, p. 430)
  • A long-running Aboriginal-led justice reinvestment project in western NSW recorded a 38% fall in charges across the top five juvenile offence categories and an estimated impact about five times its annual cost. (SJR 2025, p. 431)
  • An on-Country healing centre and youth employment program run with Traditional Owners contributed to a 95% fall in recorded youth offences between 2018–19 and 2021–22. (SJR 2025, p. 434)
Solutions
Make justice reinvestment funding long term

Move national justice reinvestment funding from short grants to ten-year, indexed commitments with community control of design.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Fund alternatives to custody on Country

Co-fund residential healing and alternative-to-custody programs designed by Traditional Owners, with a path to full local management.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 434
Philanthropy as patient, flexible capital

Provide multi-year backbone funding for local justice reinvestment teams so they can hold data, convene partners and outlast political cycles.

Philanthropy and businesslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (justice reinvestment backbone models)
Community-owned data for justice reinvestment

Give each site shared, community-governed data tools to track local indicators and reinvestment returns.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Number of funded community-led justice reinvestment sites and funding term
  • Local charges, bail refusals and detention days (site-level)
  • Community-defined wellbeing and safety indicators at each site

How Wathaga can help. Justice reinvestment depends on shared local data; Wathaga can be the community-governed home for that data, with indicators and theories of change co-created by each site.

UNDRIP articles 3, 4, 5, 34 · SDGs 16, 11, 17 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 4

Justice, policing and safety · kb-011Cognitive disability, FASD and the justice systemT10T11T14SJR 184 solutions

A high share of criminalised First Nations people live with cognitive or intellectual disability, often undiagnosed. The Disability Royal Commission called their over-representation in custody, especially youth detention, a hidden national crisis. Early assessment and community-based support can keep people out of systems that are not built for them.

Evidence
  • The Disability Royal Commission described the over-representation of First Nations people with cognitive disability in custody, especially youth detention, as a largely hidden national crisis driven by systemic disadvantage. (SJR 2025, p. 399)
  • It recommended ending indefinite detention, banning solitary confinement of children with disability and strengthening ACCO-led disability services. (SJR 2025, p. 399)
  • The report calls for assessments for cognitive impairment and FASD from early childhood, with courts, police and corrections required to take them into account. (SJR 2025, p. 429)
  • Children with disability in out-of-home care or detention cannot use their NDIS funding while incarcerated. (SJR 2025, p. 114)
Solutions
End indefinite detention of people found unfit to plead

Repeal laws allowing indefinite detention and provide supported community placements instead.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 399
Community-led early assessment

Fund community-designed screening and diagnosis for FASD and cognitive impairment from early childhood, linked to family support.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 429
Keep NDIS supports during custody

Allow NDIS supports to continue in detention and on release so people are not left without help at the most critical time.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 114
Disability screening in custody

Introduce routine disability screening at police custody and prison reception, with health information available to courts.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 429
Measures to track
  • People screened for cognitive disability at custody reception
  • People held under indefinite detention orders
  • NDIS participants retaining supports during custody

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help community-led assessment programs track referrals and outcomes while applying strict, community-set rules for sensitive health data.

UNDRIP articles 21, 22, 24 · SDGs 10, 16, 3 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Children, families and child protection · kb-012Supporting families instead of removing childrenT12T4T9aT9bSJR 18SJR 164 solutions

First Nations children are removed into out-of-home care at about ten times the rate of other children, and rates today exceed those during the period examined by the Bringing Them Home inquiry. Poverty, overcrowding and family violence are often treated as neglect rather than met with support. Removal is also a strong pathway into youth and adult justice systems.

Evidence
  • In 2024, 50 in every 1,000 First Nations children were in out-of-home care compared with 4.8 per 1,000 non-Indigenous children, just over ten times the rate. (SJR 2025, p. 407)
  • Neglect was the primary reason in 28.6% of substantiations for First Nations children in 2022–23 against 16.8% for other children, reflecting poverty treated as parental failure. (SJR 2025, p. 407)
  • State agencies are now removing First Nations children at higher rates than during the period investigated by Bringing Them Home. (SJR 2025, p. 406)
  • Widely used structured decision-making tools have been found to rely on factors correlated with race and to be less accurate for First Nations children. (SJR 2025, p. 410)
  • The rate of children in out-of-home care was 52.2 per 1,000 and the target is worsening. (PC 2026, Target 12)
Solutions
Shift funding to family support and early help

Direct child protection budgets toward ACCO-led prevention, practical financial and housing support, and intensive family support.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 18
Transfer authority to Aboriginal organisations

Delegate statutory decision-making and case management for First Nations children to community-controlled agencies, with matching resources.

States and territorieslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (delegated authority models, Family Matters reporting)
Review risk assessment tools for bias

Independently audit decision-making tools for racial bias and redesign them with First Nations practitioners.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 410
Family-led decision-making

Make Aboriginal family-led decision-making available to every family before removal is considered.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (Aboriginal family-led decision-making programs)
Measures to track
  • Children in out-of-home care per 1,000 (PC target 12)
  • Share of child protection spending on prevention and family support
  • Substantiations primarily for neglect, by Indigenous status
  • Children under delegated Aboriginal authority

How Wathaga can help. Family-support ACCOs could use Wathaga to evidence what keeps children safely at home, using family-defined outcomes rather than compliance metrics alone.

UNDRIP articles 7, 8, 21, 22 · SDGs 1, 10, 16 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 3

Children, families and child protection · kb-013Applying the Child Placement Principle in fullT12T16SJR 16SJR 184 solutions

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle requires prevention, partnership, placement with kin, participation and connection, but it is applied unevenly. Children are still placed permanently with non-Indigenous carers and lose contact with family, culture and Country. The consequences echo the harms of earlier removal policies.

Evidence
  • First Nations children continue to be removed and placed permanently with non-Indigenous people, contrary to state legislation and the Child Placement Principle. (SJR 2025, p. 407)
  • International human rights bodies have raised concern about rising out-of-home care numbers and inconsistent application of the Child Placement Principle. (SJR 2025, p. 259)
  • SNAICC urged that laws and policies for First Nations children be developed against both UNDRIP and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. (SJR 2025, p. 101)
Solutions
Legislate all five elements of the Principle

Embed prevention, partnership, placement, participation and connection in child protection law with compliance reporting.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (SNAICC Child Placement Principle guidance)
Independent Commissioners for First Nations children

Establish or strengthen dedicated commissioners with powers to audit placements and permanency decisions.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 291
Kinship carer support

Fund ACCOs to find, assess and support kinship carers on par with foster care allowances.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (kinship care support programs)
Cultural connection plans led by family

Ensure every child in care has a cultural plan developed with family and community and reviewed regularly.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Measures to track
  • Children placed with kin or other First Nations carers (%)
  • Children in care with a current cultural support plan
  • Permanent care orders to non-Indigenous carers

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can let ACCOs monitor placement and connection outcomes for children in their care, with data held under community governance rather than only in departmental systems.

UNDRIP articles 7, 8, 11, 13, 22 · SDGs 10, 16 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 3

Children, families and child protection · kb-014Family safety led by communitiesT13T12T14SJR 16SJR 104 solutions

Family and domestic violence was raised as a serious concern in many communities, alongside a lack of culturally safe services. Violence against First Nations women is severe and under-addressed, and current responses can lead to children being removed or women being criminalised. Community-controlled family violence services and women's legal services show what works.

Evidence
  • National reports highlight higher rates of family violence experienced by First Nations women and children, and a parliamentary inquiry examined murdered and missing First Nations women and children. (SJR 2025, p. 396)
  • Community-controlled family violence services and specialist First Nations women's legal services show intersectional approaches work when communities govern them. (SJR 2025, p. 396)
  • Communities described family violence as an urgent issue and pointed to the shortage of culturally safe services and community-led responses. (SJR 2025, p. 126)
  • Children witnessing family violence can lead to emotional abuse findings and removal, rather than support for the family to stay together safely. (SJR 2025, p. 407)
  • Progress on reducing family violence against women and children could not be assessed nationally. (PC 2026, Target 13)
Solutions
Long-term funding for community-controlled family violence services

Fund ACCO family violence and healing services through multi-year, needs-based agreements under the national family safety plan.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Keep victim-survivors and children together

Change child protection practice so the response to family violence is safety support for mother and child, not removal.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 407
Men's healing and cultural programs

Resource men's groups and healing on Country led by Aboriginal men and Elders.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Community-defined safety measures

Develop safety indicators with women's groups to fill the national data gap on family violence.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Hospitalisation from family violence assault (PC target 13 indicator)
  • Funding for community-controlled family violence services
  • Community-defined family safety indicators

How Wathaga can help. Because national family safety progress cannot be assessed, community-defined measures held safely in Wathaga could fill part of the evidence gap while protecting victim-survivors' privacy.

UNDRIP articles 7, 21, 22 · SDGs 5, 16, 3 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 4

Health, wellbeing and disability · kb-015Culturally safe health care and strong ACCHOsT1T2T14SJR 10SJR 144 solutions

Many people avoid mainstream health services because they feel judged or unsafe, and some experience care shaped by racist assumptions. Aboriginal community-controlled health organisations provide comprehensive, trusted primary care and are major employers of First Nations people. Their reach is limited by short-term, competitive funding.

Evidence
  • NACCHO told the Commission that ACCHOs deliver comprehensive primary care, continuity and cultural safety, which are key to their success. (SJR 2025, p. 115)
  • ACCHOs together employ around 7,000 staff, 54% of them First Nations people, making them the third-largest employer of First Nations people. (SJR 2025, p. 125)
  • Communities described racist assumptions in health care, such as beliefs about higher pain thresholds, that lead to poorer care and avoidance of services. (SJR 2025, p. 120)
  • Five years into the National Agreement only 4 of 19 targets were on track, and community control was a key factor where progress occurred. (SJR 2025, p. 110)
  • Life expectancy gaps were 8.8 years for males and 8.1 for females; improving but not on track. (PC 2026, Target 1)
Solutions
Needs-based, long-term ACCHO funding

Replace program grants with needs-based, indexed, long-term core funding for ACCHOs, including for workforce and evaluation.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Accountable cultural safety in mainstream health

Require hospitals and health services to report on cultural safety and racism using measures set with First Nations health organisations.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 128
Fund Aboriginal liaison and health worker roles

Expand Aboriginal health liaison officers and health workers across hospitals and specialist services.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 120
Grow the First Nations health workforce

Invest in training pathways from school into nursing, allied health and medicine, delivered with ACCHOs.

ACCOs and communitieslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (community-controlled workforce pathways)
Measures to track
  • Life expectancy at birth (PC target 1)
  • Share of First Nations primary health care delivered by ACCHOs
  • Patient-reported cultural safety in hospitals
  • First Nations people in the health workforce

How Wathaga can help. ACCHOs can use Wathaga to report outcomes in their own terms, combining clinical and cultural measures, and to show funders the value of comprehensive care.

UNDRIP articles 21, 23, 24, 31 · SDGs 3, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Health, wellbeing and disability · kb-016Chronic disease and services in regional and remote areasT1T9aT9bT19SJR 104 solutions

Communities outside major centres described having no full-time doctor, midwife or mental health worker, and long trips for treatment without transport or accommodation. Kidney disease and preventable conditions linked to poor housing remain common. Infrastructure, water quality and workforce shortages all contribute.

Evidence
  • Many communities reported no permanent doctor, maternal care, mental health worker or specialists, and patchy ambulance cover. (SJR 2025, p. 121)
  • People described Elders relying on a single bus for dialysis and having to travel long distances without transport or accommodation for treatment. (SJR 2025, p. 121)
  • Communities raised rheumatic heart disease, largely eliminated elsewhere, as still affecting First Nations children because of unsuitable and overcrowded housing. (SJR 2025, p. 121)
Solutions
Dialysis and treatment closer to home

Fund community-based dialysis and outreach specialist services, plus patient travel and accommodation that covers carers.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 121
Housing as rheumatic heart disease prevention

Pair health-hardware repairs and overcrowding reduction with ACCHO screening programs.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (environmental health and RHD prevention)
Allocate by need, not remoteness alone

Use need-based formulas for regional health funding so non-remote communities with high need are not overlooked.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 133
Local health workforce pipelines

Train and employ local people as health workers, drivers and practitioners through ACCHOs.

ACCOs and communitieslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (community-controlled workforce models)
Measures to track
  • Communities with a resident or regular GP service
  • Dialysis places available locally
  • Acute rheumatic fever notifications in children

How Wathaga can help. Communities could map service gaps and travel burdens in Wathaga and pair that with health outcomes, giving strong local evidence for need-based funding.

UNDRIP articles 21, 24 · SDGs 3, 6, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Health, wellbeing and disability · kb-017Suicide prevention and social and emotional wellbeingT14T18T16SJR 16SJR 14SJR 104 solutions

Rising deaths by suicide were among the most urgent concerns raised across the country. Racism, removal, incarceration and missing mental health services all feed distress, while culture, connection and community control protect wellbeing. Communities want culturally grounded, locally led supports rather than mainstream services alone.

Evidence
  • Communities expressed critical concern about the growing number of First Nations people dying by suicide and in custody. (SJR 2025, p. 17)
  • Research cited in the report shows racism increases the risk of mental ill health and suicide among First Peoples. (SJR 2025, p. 97)
  • People named culturally safe counselling, alcohol and drug treatment, rehabilitation on Country and Aboriginal psychologists as critical but missing. (SJR 2025, p. 120)
  • The Mayi Kuwayu longitudinal study, designed with communities, is building evidence that culture is a protective factor for health and wellbeing. (SJR 2025, p. 296)
  • The suicide rate was 33.9 per 100,000 and the target is worsening. (PC 2026, Target 14)
Solutions
Community-led suicide prevention funding

Fund regional, community-controlled suicide prevention and postvention, governed through the social and emotional wellbeing partnership.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Invest in healing and cultural connection

Resource cultural camps, healing programs and intergenerational learning on Country as wellbeing infrastructure.

Commonwealthlong termBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Aftercare that is culturally safe

Link everyone leaving hospital after a suicide attempt to an Aboriginal-led aftercare service.

States and territoriesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (culturally safe aftercare models)
Measure cultural determinants of wellbeing

Co-design wellbeing measures that include connection to culture, Country and kin, alongside clinical indicators.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Suicide rate per 100,000 (PC target 14)
  • Access to community-controlled social and emotional wellbeing services
  • Community-defined cultural connection indicators

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can carry cultural-determinant indicators that mainstream data systems miss, helping communities show how cultural programs protect wellbeing.

UNDRIP articles 21, 24, 31 · SDGs 3, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 4

Health, wellbeing and disability · kb-018Disability rights and an NDIS that works for First PeoplesT1T14T17SJR 7SJR 104 solutions

First Nations people with disability told the Commission the NDIS is complex, inflexible and not built around community life. Planners often lack local and cultural knowledge, and supports such as access to Country can be refused. Rights for First Peoples with disability need both UNDRIP and the Disability Convention to be applied together.

Evidence
  • Participants said the NDIS is hard to navigate, especially with low literacy, and many families felt pushed into agency-managed plans without real choice. (SJR 2025, p. 113)
  • People asked for NDIS planners who know their communities, geography, local services and family caring arrangements. (SJR 2025, p. 113)
  • A carer reported that access to Country, which would greatly help a family member's health, was refused as not reasonable or necessary. (SJR 2025, p. 131)
  • The First Peoples Disability Network argued that UNDRIP alone is not enough and must be implemented alongside the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (SJR 2025, p. 101)
Solutions
Community-controlled NDIS navigation

Fund ACCOs and First Nations disability organisations to deliver local planning support, navigation and plain-language information.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 113
Recognise culture and Country as reasonable supports

Update NDIS guidelines so cultural participation and access to Country can be funded where they support the person's goals.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 131
Apply UNDRIP and the CRPD together

Include CRPD and UNDRIP tests in compatibility statements for disability laws and policies.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 13
Grow First Nations disability providers

Support Aboriginal-run disability services in thin markets through block or capacity funding.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (thin-market commissioning)
Measures to track
  • First Nations NDIS participants with self- or plan-managed options
  • First Nations people with disability reporting satisfaction with supports
  • Registered First Nations disability providers per region

How Wathaga can help. Disability organisations could use Wathaga to gather accessible feedback (audio, video, photo) from participants, turning lived experience into evidence for NDIS reform.

UNDRIP articles 21, 22, 24 · SDGs 10, 3 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Early years, education and learning · kb-019Strong starts: early childhood education and developmentT3T4T2SJR 5SJR 104 solutions

Preschool enrolment has grown strongly and the early learning target is on track, but the share of children developmentally on track at school entry is going backwards. Community-led early years services that centre culture and family are effective but often run on fragile funding. Early years outcomes shape later schooling, health and justice outcomes.

Evidence
  • Preschool attendance among First Nations children aged 3–5 rose from 31.4% in 2001 to 48.9% in 2021. (SJR 2025, p. 206)
  • Early childhood education enrolment was the education target showing good improvement and on track to be met. (SJR 2025, p. 207)
  • A Queensland community-led early childhood, parenting and family education centre grounded in culture was described as essential but at risk because of inadequate government funding. (SJR 2025, p. 114)
  • Preschool enrolment target met. (PC 2026, Target 3)
  • Children assessed as developmentally on track in all five AEDC domains: 33.9%, and worsening. (PC 2026, Target 4)
Solutions
Secure funding for Aboriginal early years services

Provide ongoing, needs-based operational funding to ACCO early learning and family centres instead of time-limited program grants.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Integrated child and family hubs

Co-locate early learning, maternal and child health, and family support in community-controlled hubs.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (integrated early years hubs)
Culturally grounded developmental assessment

Work with ACCOs to interpret AEDC results alongside community measures of cultural strength and family wellbeing.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Philanthropic support for early years sector capability

Fund ACCO-led early years workforce training and governance through long-term partnerships.

Philanthropy and businesslong termBasis: evaluation evidence (early years sector development)
Measures to track
  • Preschool enrolment in the year before school (PC target 3)
  • Children developmentally on track in all five AEDC domains (PC target 4)
  • Community-controlled early learning places

How Wathaga can help. Early years services could use Wathaga to hold baselines and track signals of change in child and family wellbeing that sit alongside AEDC results.

UNDRIP articles 14, 21, 22 · SDGs 4, 3 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Early years, education and learning · kb-020Ending disproportionate suspension and exclusion from schoolT5T7T11SJR 54 solutions

First Nations students are suspended, excluded and expelled far more often than their share of enrolments, frequently for behaviour linked to trauma or disability. Exclusion increases exposure to policing and youth justice and undermines education targets. Data on exclusion by Indigenous status is patchy across jurisdictions.

Evidence
  • In Queensland in 2019, First Nations students were just over 10% of state school enrolments but received more than a quarter of all fixed-term and permanent exclusions. (SJR 2025, p. 208)
  • In Victoria, First Nations students were 2.3% of enrolments but 6.5% of expulsions. (SJR 2025, p. 208)
  • At the time of the national study only Queensland and Victoria recorded exclusion data by Indigenous status, and there is a clear link between out-of-home care and exclusion. (SJR 2025, p. 208)
  • Students are often suspended or expelled for behaviours linked to trauma or disability, with knock-on effects into child protection and youth justice. (SJR 2025, p. 207)
Solutions
Set reduction targets for exclusionary discipline

Publish suspension and expulsion data by Indigenous status in every jurisdiction and commit to reducing disproportion.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 5
Trauma-informed and disability-aware schools

Fund therapeutic staff, Aboriginal education officers and disability support so behaviour is met with help rather than exclusion.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 122
Community-run alternative and re-engagement learning

Resource ACCO and Indigenous-led schools and programs for students the mainstream system has not served well.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 5
Family and Elder involvement in behaviour decisions

Require schools to involve family and Aboriginal staff or Elders before any long suspension or exclusion.

States and territoriesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (culturally responsive school discipline)
Measures to track
  • Suspensions and exclusions per 100 First Nations students, by jurisdiction
  • Ratio of First Nations to non-Indigenous exclusion rates
  • Year 12 attainment (PC target 5)

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help community education groups compile school-level exclusion data and family stories, supporting advocacy where official data is missing.

UNDRIP articles 2, 14, 21 · SDGs 4, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3, 4

Early years, education and learning · kb-021Culturally safe, Indigenous-led schooling and truth in the curriculumT5T7T16T18SJR 5SJR 44 solutions

Communities want schools that combine strong academic learning with culture, language, Elders and truth-telling, and that meet children's basic needs. Disengagement often reflects hunger, overcrowding or caring duties rather than lack of ability. Indigenous-designed programs show strong retention and completion results.

Evidence
  • Communities asked for two-way learning, Elders in schools, outdoor and on-Country learning and less emphasis on standardised testing. (SJR 2025, p. 122)
  • Young people who disengage from school are often dealing with unmet basic needs such as food, a bed or safety at home. (SJR 2025, p. 122)
  • An Aboriginal secondary training academy co-designed with communities has shown strong results in retention, certificate completion and transitions to further study or work. (SJR 2025, p. 124)
  • Communities want a national curriculum that tells the truth about colonisation and its impacts. (SJR 2025, p. 124)
  • Year 12 or equivalent attainment is improving but not on track. (PC 2026, Target 5)
Solutions
Embed Indigenous-designed learning models

Adopt Indigenous-designed, personalised learning in mainstream systems and fund community-controlled education bodies and Indigenous-led schools.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 5
Truth-telling across the curriculum

Develop local history and language content with Traditional Owners for every school.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 4
Wraparound supports at school

Provide meals, transport and family liaison so children's basic needs do not block learning.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 123
Elders and cultural educators in classrooms

Pay Elders and community educators for their teaching time through school partnerships with local ACCOs.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 122
Measures to track
  • Year 12 or equivalent attainment, 20–24 year olds (PC target 5)
  • Schools with paid Elder or cultural educator programs
  • Student-reported cultural safety at school

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help schools and communities co-create learning frameworks and capture student voice in many formats, making cultural outcomes visible alongside test results.

UNDRIP articles 13, 14, 15 · SDGs 4, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Early years, education and learning · kb-022Pathways into further education, training and work for young peopleT6T7T8SJR 5SJR 84 solutions

Year 12 completion and post-school qualifications have more than doubled over twenty years, showing what sustained effort achieves. Yet the targets for further education and youth engagement are still not on track. Culturally safe, long-term programs that link school to study and careers are proving their worth.

Evidence
  • Among First Nations adults, Year 12 completion rose from 19.4% in 2001 to 39% in 2021 and non-school qualifications from 19.7% to 46%. (SJR 2025, p. 207)
  • Completion of Certificate III or IV rose from 9.4% in 2001 to 24% in 2021. (SJR 2025, p. 207)
  • A national STEM academy for First Nations girls and young women, delivered with over 85% Indigenous staff, offers mentoring and pathways from Year 8 into careers. (SJR 2025, p. 123)
  • Tertiary qualification attainment is improving but not on track. (PC 2026, Target 6)
  • Youth engagement in employment, education or training is improving but not on track. (PC 2026, Target 7)
Solutions
Long-term funding for proven pathway programs

Commit multi-year funding to culturally safe school-to-career programs that have demonstrated results.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 123
Community-controlled training providers

Support ACCO and Indigenous-owned registered training organisations linked to local jobs.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 125
Industry partnerships with paid placements

Employers and universities co-design paid cadetships and internships with First Nations organisations.

Philanthropy and business1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (cadetship and internship programs)
Track pathways in community terms

Follow young people's transitions with consent and community-agreed indicators, not only enrolment counts.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • 25–34 year olds with Certificate III or above (PC target 6)
  • 15–24 year olds in employment, education or training (PC target 7)
  • Completion rates in Indigenous-led pathway programs

How Wathaga can help. Programs can use Wathaga to follow young people's journeys with consent, showing long-term pathway outcomes that short grant reports miss.

UNDRIP articles 14, 17, 21 · SDGs 4, 8 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Economic participation and self-determination · kb-023Secure, culturally safe employmentT8T7T18SJR 14SJR 104 solutions

Employment has improved and the national target is on track, but rates fall sharply with remoteness and many people are stuck on short contracts tied to government funding cycles. Workplace racism and heavy cultural load push people out of jobs. Community-controlled employment services and culturally safe workplaces help people stay and progress.

Evidence
  • In 2022–23 the First Nations employment rate for people aged 15–64 was 57% and unemployment 9.5%, with employment at 58% in cities but 30% in very remote areas. (SJR 2025, p. 209)
  • Many people only get 12–18 month contracts that mirror government program funding, limiting access to housing, superannuation and career growth. (SJR 2025, p. 125)
  • The Indigenous-led Gari Yala survey found many First Nations employees experience workplace racism, exclusion and excessive cultural load. (SJR 2025, p. 210)
  • Indigenous-owned businesses employ First Nations workers at higher rates than other firms. (SJR 2025, p. 209)
  • Employment of 25–64 year olds was 55.7%, on track. (PC 2026, Target 8)
Solutions
Longer funding cycles to end insecure jobs

Move First Nations service funding to five-year-plus terms so organisations can offer permanent employment.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 125
Community-controlled employment services

Invest in First Nations-run job services and remote employment programs designed with communities, without punitive compliance.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 209
Anti-racism and cultural load standards at work

Employers adopt anti-racism plans, recognise and pay for cultural load, and offer fair complaints mechanisms.

Philanthropy and businessnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 210
Measure workplace cultural safety

Use Indigenous-led survey tools to track racism, inclusion and progression inside organisations.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: evaluation evidence (Gari Yala survey approach)
Measures to track
  • Employment rate 25–64 (PC target 8)
  • Employment rate by remoteness
  • Share of First Nations staff on fixed-term contracts
  • Workplace racism reported by First Nations staff

How Wathaga can help. Employers and ACCOs can use Wathaga to run and track culturally safe workplace measures over time, with staff data governed under Indigenous data sovereignty principles.

UNDRIP articles 17, 21 · SDGs 8, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Economic participation and self-determination · kb-024Growing Indigenous business and procurement integrityT8SJR 114 solutions

First Nations businesses contribute billions in revenue and wages and employ large numbers of people, and procurement policy has opened markets. But audits show many contracts do not meet mandatory requirements and large contract values are exempted with little explanation. Businesses also face barriers to finance, investment and intergenerational wealth.

Evidence
  • First Nations businesses generate about $16 billion a year in revenue, employ over 116,000 people and pay $4.2 billion in wages. (SJR 2025, p. 213)
  • The Indigenous Procurement Policy sets a minimum target of 3% of contracts to Indigenous businesses, rising to 4% by 2029–30. (SJR 2025, p. 213)
  • An audit found 28% of contracts were not compliant with minimum mandatory requirements at June 2024, and 1,475 contracts worth $69.3 billion were exempted between 2016 and 2024, often for unclear reasons. (SJR 2025, p. 214)
  • First Nations businesses face low intergenerational wealth transfer, bias in investment and barriers to accessing capital. (SJR 2025, p. 214)
Solutions
Enforce and report procurement compliance

Strengthen contract management and public reporting on mandatory Indigenous participation requirements, and explain every exemption.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 214
Evaluate procurement outcomes, not just spend

Fund independent evaluation of procurement policy against First Nations employment and business growth.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 214
Patient capital for First Nations enterprise

Create blended finance and investment vehicles governed with First Nations investors to overcome access-to-capital barriers.

Philanthropy and businesslong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 214
Supplier diversity beyond government

Corporates set and publicly report Indigenous procurement targets with verified suppliers.

Philanthropy and businessnowBasis: evaluation evidence (corporate supplier diversity programs)
Measures to track
  • Value and share of Commonwealth contracts to Indigenous businesses
  • Contracts compliant with mandatory minimum requirements (%)
  • Revenue and employment of First Nations businesses

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help Indigenous enterprise networks evidence social and cultural value created by First Nations businesses, beyond dollars spent.

UNDRIP articles 3, 20, 21 · SDGs 8, 9, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3, 4

Economic participation and self-determination · kb-025Stopping black cladding and protecting Indigenous identity in fundingT8SJR 10SJR 113 solutions

Black cladding happens when non-Indigenous businesses or organisations use token Indigenous involvement to win contracts or grants meant for First Peoples. It diverts money, undermines genuine Indigenous enterprises and ACCOs and erodes trust. A parliamentary inquiry recommended clearer definitions, monitoring and penalties.

Evidence
  • A 2024 parliamentary inquiry into economic self-determination heard many concerns that non-Indigenous businesses exploit dedicated First Nations programs such as procurement policy. (SJR 2025, p. 214)
  • The inquiry recommended reviewing the definition of an Indigenous business, investigating black cladding and introducing tougher monitoring and penalties. (SJR 2025, p. 215)
  • Reviewers heard of non-Indigenous organisations restructuring boards to appear community-controlled in order to retain funding. (SJR 2025, p. 288)
  • Communities raised concerns that false claims of identity and token involvement divert opportunities from those entitled to them. (SJR 2025, p. 141)
Solutions
Tighten the definition of Indigenous business and ACCO

Adopt definitions that test real ownership, control and community accountability, developed with First Nations peaks.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 215
Penalties for black cladding

Introduce monitoring, audits and sanctions for misrepresentation in procurement and grants.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 215
Community verification processes

Support community-led verification of organisations claiming to be Aboriginal-controlled, with respect for Stolen Generations experiences of identity.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 141
Measures to track
  • Complaints of black cladding investigated and resolved
  • Share of First Nations-targeted funding to verified community-controlled organisations

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga's ownership and governance records for organisations can support transparent, community-verified information about who is genuinely community-controlled.

UNDRIP articles 3, 4, 33 · SDGs 8, 16 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Economic participation and self-determination · kb-026Economic self-determination and fiscal autonomyT8T15bT15aSJR 10SJR 15SJR 24 solutions

Australia has no policy or legal framework for Indigenous fiscal self-government, unlike some comparable countries. Political voice without economic power leaves rights fragile, so First Nations leaders are calling for a shift from welfare-focused policy to wealth creation, backed by land, water, sea and intellectual property reform. Indigenous-specific spending is also a small fraction of the national budget.

Evidence
  • The report identifies the absence of any framework for Indigenous fiscal self-government in Australia, in contrast to Canada. (SJR 2025, p. 286)
  • Indigenous-specific Commonwealth spending in 2023–24 was estimated at $5.3 billion, about 0.77% of total budgeted expenditure. (SJR 2025, p. 287)
  • A national seminar series called for a shift from welfare and simple industry participation to policy that underpins sustainable First Nations wealth creation, including water, sea country and cultural IP reform. (SJR 2025, p. 215)
  • In Aotearoa New Zealand, treaty settlements helped grow the Māori asset base to about NZ$126 billion. (SJR 2025, p. 194)
Solutions
Co-design a national economic self-determination framework

Work through the First Nations Economic Partnership to create a framework covering fiscal arrangements, land, water, sea and IP rights.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 215
Pilot regional fiscal self-government

Pool funding into regional First Nations-governed budgets with multi-year flexibility and joint accountability.

Commonwealthlong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 286
Treaty and agreement-based economic bases

Use treaty and settlement processes to provide capital and revenue streams for First Nations institutions.

States and territorieslong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 194
Community-owned theories of change for economic transformation

Support First Nations economic bodies to build their own theory of change, signals of change and baselines so progress is judged on their terms.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Share of Indigenous-specific funding under First Nations-governed allocation
  • First Nations-held assets and capital under community control
  • Regional agreements with pooled, flexible funding

How Wathaga can help. Kowa's UMEL approach, supported by Wathaga, helps economic bodies set a theory of change, signals of change and baselines they own, so transformation is measured by community-defined success.

UNDRIP articles 3, 4, 20, 26, 39 · SDGs 8, 10, 17 · Priority Reforms 1, 2

Economic participation and self-determination · kb-027Redress for stolen wagesT8T18SJR 6SJR 33 solutions

From roughly the 1880s to the 1960s many First Peoples' wages and entitlements were withheld, paid in rations or held in trust accounts they could not access. Some state schemes have operated, but none met international standards for adequate reparation, and class actions have filled the gap. Several jurisdictions still have no scheme.

Evidence
  • Wages of countless First Peoples were unpaid, underpaid, paid in rations or placed in inaccessible trusts from about the 1880s to the 1960s, and benefits such as pensions were also withheld. (SJR 2025, p. 211)
  • Reparation schemes ran in Queensland (2002–2009), NSW (2005–2011) and WA (2012), but none addressed UN principles on adequate reparation. (SJR 2025, p. 211)
  • A $190 million Queensland class action superseded a criticised $21 million scheme, against an estimated $500 million owed in that state; an NT class action settled in 2024 for up to $180 million. (SJR 2025, p. 211)
Solutions
Establish reparation schemes where none exist

Jurisdictions without a stolen wages scheme set one up urgently, co-designed with claimants and their families.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 6
Meet the UN reparation standard

Design schemes that cover full losses, interest and denied benefits, and include descendants of deceased workers.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 211
Open records and support claimants

Fund Aboriginal organisations to help families access archives and lodge claims, as part of truth-telling.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 211
Measures to track
  • Jurisdictions with an operating stolen wages reparation scheme
  • Claims lodged and paid, and value paid against estimated loss

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga could help family history and truth-telling groups organise records and testimony securely, under family control.

UNDRIP articles 17, 28, 40 · SDGs 8, 10, 16 · Priority Reforms 3

Housing, infrastructure and essential services · kb-028Safe, healthy housing and ending overcrowdingT9aT9bT1T12T19SJR 104 solutions

Communities describe deteriorating houses, mould, long waiting lists and homes unsuited to large families, extreme climates or people with disability. Poor housing drives illness, family stress and contact with child protection and justice systems. People want dignity and liveable homes and more transparency in how housing money is spent.

Evidence
  • People reported living in tents or unsafe homes because of shortages, and asked for houses suited to multigenerational families, Elders, people with disability and people leaving prison or escaping violence. (SJR 2025, p. 118)
  • Homes are deteriorating through underfunding and poor maintenance, with mould common and people afraid to report problems for fear of eviction. (SJR 2025, p. 118)
  • In remote regions housing is often poorly designed for the climate. (SJR 2025, p. 119)
  • Communities reported a lack of transparency and accountability in how housing resources are allocated. (SJR 2025, p. 120)
  • People living in appropriately sized (not overcrowded) housing: improving but not on track. (PC 2026, Target 9)
Solutions
Long-term remote and regional housing investment

Commit multi-decade funding for new homes and maintenance, shared under a housing policy partnership with First Nations housing bodies.

Commonwealthlong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 120
Community-controlled housing providers

Transfer management of social housing to Aboriginal community housing organisations with funding for repairs and tenancy support.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (Aboriginal community housing models)
Climate-resilient, culturally designed homes

Design homes with communities for large families, accessibility and extreme heat, prioritising energy-efficient upgrades.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 118
Tenancy and legal advocacy

Fund culturally safe tenancy advocacy to prevent unfair evictions and secure repairs.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 118
Measures to track
  • People in appropriately sized housing (PC target 9a)
  • Households with functioning health hardware (water, waste, cooking)
  • Average wait time for repairs in community housing

How Wathaga can help. Tenants and housing organisations could log repairs, photos and outcomes in Wathaga, giving communities shared evidence on housing condition and responsiveness.

UNDRIP articles 21, 23 · SDGs 11, 1, 3, 13 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 4

Housing, infrastructure and essential services · kb-029Ending homelessness with culturally safe crisis supportT9aT9bT10T13SJR 103 solutions

Homelessness, including rough sleeping, is linked to overcrowding, family violence and release from prison, and mainstream shelters often exclude people with complex needs. Locally led, culturally safe services that take people as they are have proven a trusted entry point to housing and health care. Lack of a stable address also drives remand and blocks access to services.

Evidence
  • A community-led overnight shelter run by an Aboriginal corporation succeeds because it is local, flexible, trauma-informed and does not turn people away for intoxication or complex behaviour. (SJR 2025, p. 119)
  • Communities said legal, housing and tenancy advocacy is often out of reach, leaving people desperate where violence, eviction or incarceration is involved. (SJR 2025, p. 118)
  • Experts link the housing crisis to rising remand, since people without secure accommodation are more likely to be refused bail. (SJR 2025, p. 397)
Solutions
Fund Aboriginal-run crisis and transitional housing

Provide ongoing funding for community-controlled shelters, transitional housing and outreach.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 119
Housing on release from prison

Guarantee supported accommodation for people leaving custody, linked to ACCO throughcare.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 118
Housing First with cultural support

Adopt Housing First approaches delivered with Aboriginal organisations and wraparound support.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (Housing First evaluations)
Measures to track
  • First Nations people accessing specialist homelessness services
  • People exiting prison into homelessness
  • Funded Aboriginal-run crisis beds

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help low-barrier services capture outcomes respectfully and simply, giving them evidence for ongoing funding without adding heavy reporting load.

UNDRIP articles 21, 23 · SDGs 11, 1 · Priority Reforms 2

Housing, infrastructure and essential services · kb-030Essential services and community infrastructure in remote areasT19T9aT9bT1T17SJR 10SJR 154 solutions

Many remote communities face chronic underinvestment in water, power, transport, emergency services and telecommunications. Prepaid power runs out, water may need to be shipped in, and after-hours police or health staff may not exist, leaving communities to manage emergencies themselves. Climate change is making these gaps worse.

Evidence
  • Communities continue to face chronic underinvestment in housing, clean water, electricity, transport and digital connectivity, most acutely in remote areas. (SJR 2025, p. 111)
  • In remote island communities visited, power depended on unaffordable prepaid cards or diesel generators, water was shipped in, and there were no after-hours police or clinic staff. (SJR 2025, p. 112)
  • Telecommunications were so unreliable that emergency calls were regularly unavailable, and the regional council risked insolvency despite lobbying for funding. (SJR 2025, p. 112)
  • Where First Peoples live shapes the price of food and fuel and access to clean drinking water, rubbish collection, postal and legal services. (SJR 2025, p. 98)
Solutions
Essential services guarantee

Agree national minimum service standards for water, power and communications in discrete communities, with funding to meet them.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (essential services standards; SJR p. 111)
Fix prepaid power and water quality

Provide hardship protections for prepaid power and invest in safe drinking water in every community.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 112
Community-controlled infrastructure planning

Fund local councils and ACCOs to lead infrastructure plans that include climate adaptation.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 112
Local emergency response capacity

Resource trained local responders and after-hours health and safety staff in remote communities.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 112
Measures to track
  • Communities meeting drinking water quality guidelines
  • Prepaid power disconnections per household
  • Communities with reliable mobile and emergency call coverage

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can let communities record service outages and infrastructure condition over time, building the record they need to negotiate with governments and utilities.

UNDRIP articles 21, 23, 32 · SDGs 6, 7, 9, 11 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 4

Housing, infrastructure and essential services · kb-031Digital inclusion and access to servicesT17T19T8SJR 104 solutions

Services are increasingly online, cashless and identity-heavy, which shuts out people without reliable internet, devices or documents. Communities described being unable to get a driver's licence or working with children check, and relying on a few community members to deal with Centrelink and housing. National progress on digital inclusion cannot yet be measured.

Evidence
  • Lack of internet, cashless systems and strict ID rules stop people getting basic documents such as licences and working with children checks, which affects jobs, cultural obligations and justice outcomes. (SJR 2025, p. 98)
  • People in remote communities often depend on individual community members to navigate Centrelink and housing because local services are absent. (SJR 2025, p. 98)
  • People asked for services that do not depend on internet access or complex paperwork. (SJR 2025, p. 113)
  • Progress on digital inclusion could not be assessed. (PC 2026, Target 17)
Solutions
Community digital hubs and mentors

Fund ACCO-run digital access points with trained local mentors to help people with online services.

CommonwealthnowBasis: evaluation evidence (community digital mentor programs)
Offline and in-person service options

Guarantee non-digital ways to access government services and flexible identity requirements.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 98
Affordable connectivity

Expand free public Wi-Fi and affordable data in remote communities.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (remote community Wi-Fi programs)
Low-bandwidth, multimedia data tools

Design community data tools that work offline and accept voice, photo and video so people are not excluded by literacy or connectivity.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • First Nations digital inclusion index score (PC target 17)
  • Communities with free public Wi-Fi
  • People reporting they could not access a service because it was online-only

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga accepts many data types (photo, video, documents), so it can be configured for low-connectivity, low-literacy use and help close, rather than widen, the digital gap.

UNDRIP articles 16, 21 · SDGs 9, 4, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 4

Housing, infrastructure and essential services · kb-032Needs-based services across regional, remote and urban communitiesT19T9aT9bT1T8SJR 10SJR 113 solutions

Funding for First Nations programs is often allocated by remoteness rather than need, so high-need regional and urban communities can miss out. Urban and regional voices also feel excluded from national dialogue. Communities want resource allocation based on evidence of need and local priorities.

Evidence
  • Communities nationally called for resources based on need rather than remoteness, and for support for regional, remote and urban communities alike. (SJR 2025, p. 98)
  • Some communities miss critical investment because they are not classified as remote, and urban First Nations people feel left out of national dialogue. (SJR 2025, p. 99)
  • Participants proposed that funding decisions be grounded in data and community-identified need, not geography alone. (SJR 2025, p. 129)
Solutions
Needs-based funding formulas

Design allocation formulas for First Nations services with communities, using need indicators across all regions.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Regional data for regional decisions

Provide communities with regional-level data so they can set priorities and test allocations.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 12
Urban and regional representation

Ensure peak bodies and partnership structures include urban and regional community representatives.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 98
Measures to track
  • Per-capita First Nations-specific funding by remoteness and need
  • Regions with access to regional-level Closing the Gap data

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can combine public datasets with local data so each region can produce its own needs profile and make the case for fair allocation.

UNDRIP articles 18, 21, 23 · SDGs 10, 11 · Priority Reforms 1, 4

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-033Reforming native title to deliver land justiceT15bT15aSJR 21SJR 22SJR 244 solutions

Native title has delivered some recognition but is limited in scope, vulnerable to extinguishment and demands proof of continuous connection that ignores the impact of colonisation. Claimants carry heavy costs, power imbalances and weak procedural rights, with no veto over harmful projects. The report calls for reform consistent with human rights standards.

Evidence
  • There were 652 native title determinations on the national register by 30 June 2025, including 124 where native title was found not to exist. (SJR 2025, p. 461)
  • Communities described the burden of proving continuous connection as unfair, costly and blind to the effects of colonisation. (SJR 2025, p. 133)
  • People said native title offers no veto, requires only good-faith negotiation from proponents and lacks consequences for non-compliance. (SJR 2025, p. 135)
  • The system is described as limited in scope, open to extinguishment, poorly resourced and reliant on the unpaid work of First Nations people. (SJR 2025, p. 31)
  • Land and sea rights targets are on track. (PC 2026, Target 15)
Solutions
Amend the Native Title Act

Introduce a presumption of continuity, shift the burden of proof to respondents, set aside historical extinguishment in marine parks, count off-footprint and water impacts, and strengthen procedural rights.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 21
Ratify ILO Convention 169

Ratify the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention to set binding standards across the native title system.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 22
First Peoples advisory group on reform

Establish and resource an advisory group to guide reform of native title and connected laws and their implementation.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 24
Consequences for bad-faith negotiation

Make compliance with future act processes mandatory and enforceable for governments and proponents.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 471
Measures to track
  • Land and sea under native title or other Indigenous rights (PC targets 15a, 15b)
  • Average time to determination
  • Future acts proceeding with documented FPIC

How Wathaga can help. Traditional Owner groups could use Wathaga to document their own measures of land justice—access, authority and cultural practice—beyond area statistics.

UNDRIP articles 25, 26, 27, 28, 32 · SDGs 15, 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-034Resourcing Prescribed Bodies CorporateT15bT15aT8T14SJR 234 solutions

Prescribed Bodies Corporate hold and manage native title but are expected to do so with little or no reliable funding. Traditional Owners often end up using compensation or royalties to pay for basic participation in the system, and PBCs must follow corporate law rather than traditional law. Governments have agreed in principle to an independent PBC fund but not delivered it.

Evidence
  • The Commission recommends an independent PBC operating fund guaranteed in perpetuity, plus resources for community healing and empowerment roles. (SJR 2025, p. 470)
  • Traditional Owners should not have to spend royalties, compensation or future act payments to fund their engagement in the native title system. (SJR 2025, p. 470)
  • Communities said PBCs must comply with corporate and native title law rather than traditional law and custom, and some lack plans or capacity to share benefits. (SJR 2025, p. 132)
  • The Australian Government agreed in principle to a parliamentary recommendation for an independent PBC fund with contributions from governments and proponents. (SJR 2025, p. 477)
Solutions
Establish a perpetual PBC operating fund

Create an independent fund with government and proponent contributions to guarantee core PBC operations.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 23
Fund healing and empowerment roles

Resource PBCs to address division and harm caused by the native title process.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 23
Governance that reflects law and custom

Support PBCs to design governance and dispute processes grounded in cultural authority.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 132
Philanthropic support for PBC capability

Provide flexible funding for PBC planning, governance and benefit-sharing frameworks.

Philanthropy and business1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (PBC capacity programs)
Measures to track
  • PBCs with secure core operational funding
  • PBCs with a current community-endorsed plan
  • Share of PBC costs met from compensation or royalties

How Wathaga can help. PBCs can use Wathaga to set and track benefit-sharing and Country-care indicators their members agree on, strengthening internal accountability and external funding cases.

UNDRIP articles 4, 26, 32, 39 · SDGs 15, 16, 8 · Priority Reforms 2

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-035Cultural heritage protection and FPICT15bT15aT16SJR 25SJR 244 solutions

The destruction of the 46,000-year-old caves at Juukan Gorge in 2020 exposed how weak heritage laws are, with ministerial discretion, gag clauses and little ability for Traditional Owners to stop damage. UN bodies have found Australia failed to seek free, prior and informed consent in heritage reform. Federal reform has been promised but remains incomplete.

Evidence
  • The 2020 destruction of the 46,000-year-old Juukan Gorge rock shelters, with state authorisation, brought heritage law reform into national focus. (SJR 2025, p. 475)
  • Federal and state heritage regimes rely on ministerial discretion, weak enforcement and consultation that falls short of FPIC. (SJR 2025, p. 474)
  • The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination found governments failed to seek FPIC and to protect Aboriginal heritage; governments had not responded at the time of writing. (SJR 2025, p. 476)
  • One state's heritage law review, begun in 2019, had still not been completed. (SJR 2025, p. 478)
  • Communities supported the Dhawura Ngilan framework for national standards that centre Traditional Owner authority. (SJR 2025, p. 134)
Solutions
National minimum heritage standards in federal law

Amend federal heritage and environment law to guarantee self-determination over significance, FPIC with appeal rights, a ban on gag clauses and real penalties.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 25
National heritage truth-telling and mapping

Commission, with states, a national project mapping damaged and destroyed heritage as part of truth-telling.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 25
Early engagement by industry

Companies commit to FPIC from project design onward and publish heritage agreements without restrictive clauses.

Philanthropy and businessnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 134
Traditional Owner-led heritage monitoring

Fund Traditional Owner rangers and cultural monitors to record and protect sites.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (ranger and cultural monitor programs)
Measures to track
  • Heritage approvals granted without documented FPIC
  • Agreements containing gag clauses
  • Recorded damage or destruction of significant sites

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can provide Traditional Owners with secure, access-controlled records of heritage monitoring that remain their cultural and intellectual property.

UNDRIP articles 11, 12, 19, 31, 32 · SDGs 11, 15, 16 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-036Water rights and cultural flowsT15bT15aT8SJR 21SJR 244 solutions

Water is central to caring for Country, yet water laws mostly serve agriculture and industry and give little recognition to cultural flows or Indigenous water rights. Even where native title exists over rivers, holders may still need permission to take water. Access to water for economic use is also key to unlocking land-based enterprise.

Evidence
  • Communities stressed that water allocations must provide cultural flows so people can meet their responsibilities to keep water Country healthy. (SJR 2025, p. 131)
  • Water management laws generally prioritise agricultural and industrial use, with only limited recognition of cultural flows or Indigenous water rights. (SJR 2025, p. 480)
  • One participant explained that despite native title over rivers, they still had to ask the council for water. (SJR 2025, p. 132)
  • Economic reform proposals include freshwater reform to increase First Peoples' access to water licensed for economic purposes. (SJR 2025, p. 215)
Solutions
Legislate cultural flows

Recognise cultural flows in water law and planning, with allocations held by Traditional Owner entities.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 480
Recognise inland water rights in native title

Amend native title law to recognise rights to inland waters and consider water impacts of future acts.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 21
Fund water entitlements for First Nations

Purchase and transfer water entitlements to First Nations groups for cultural and economic use.

Commonwealthlong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 215
Traditional Owner water monitoring

Support community water-health monitoring that combines cultural knowledge and science.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (Indigenous water monitoring programs)
Measures to track
  • Water entitlements held by First Nations entities (volume and share)
  • Water plans with cultural flow provisions

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can store cultural and scientific water monitoring data together under Traditional Owner governance, supporting claims for cultural flows.

UNDRIP articles 25, 26, 32 · SDGs 6, 14, 15 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-037Fair native title compensationT15bT15aT8SJR 21SJR 243 solutions

Recent court decisions have opened the way to compensation for loss of native title, including cultural loss, but there is no national approach. Litigation is slow and costly, and governments hold many of the records claimants need. A negotiated national framework and a compensation fund are being proposed.

Evidence
  • Court decisions have now enlivened access to native title compensation, and the national native title peak is developing a framework for negotiated settlements. (SJR 2025, p. 133)
  • The report suggests a compensation fund, methods for valuing cultural loss, protection from unethical practitioners and timely government release of records. (SJR 2025, p. 469)
  • Compensation has been inadequate or absent, only recently activated through a High Court decision. (SJR 2025, p. 31)
Solutions
National negotiated compensation framework

Agree a national approach with native title holders that favours negotiation over litigation and values cultural loss.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 469
Create a compensation fund

Governments set aside funds to settle liabilities in a timely way.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 469
Open government records to claimants

Establish processes for timely access to archives and departmental records needed for claims.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 469
Measures to track
  • Compensation claims lodged, settled and average time to settlement
  • Jurisdictions with a compensation fund

How Wathaga can help. Claimant groups could use Wathaga to organise evidence of cultural loss securely and under their own control.

UNDRIP articles 28, 32, 40 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-038Harmonising land rights, co-management and intersecting regimesT15bT15aT16SJR 24SJR 21SJR 254 solutions

Native title, state land rights, heritage, environmental, planning and resource laws overlap and conflict, leaving First Peoples' rights at the bottom of the hierarchy. Proponents can choose the most convenient regime, while Traditional Owners often participate unpaid. Pastoral leases covering nearly half the continent constrain custodianship.

Evidence
  • Fragmented and overlapping land, heritage and resource regimes constrain First Peoples' authority and perpetuate dispossession. (SJR 2025, p. 472)
  • Land rights schemes usually give stronger title than native title but coverage is patchy, and co-management limits Indigenous authority. (SJR 2025, p. 473)
  • Pastoral leases cover nearly half the continent and in practice usually override native title interests. (SJR 2025, p. 480)
  • Governments and companies can choose the most convenient regime, while First Peoples often take unpaid leave to take part. (SJR 2025, p. 481)
  • Communities reported land claims under state land rights law waiting years, with high legal costs. (SJR 2025, p. 131)
Solutions
Coordinated reform of intersecting laws

Use a resourced First Peoples advisory group to guide coordinated reform across native title, heritage, environment and land rights.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 24
Clear outstanding land rights claims

Resource land councils and set timeframes for deciding long-standing claims.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 131
Pay Traditional Owners to participate

Fund participation in planning and approvals processes at professional rates.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 481
Strengthen joint management

Expand co-management to genuine shared or Traditional Owner-led decision-making with economic opportunities.

States and territorieslong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 473
Measures to track
  • Outstanding land rights claims and average age
  • Protected areas under joint or Traditional Owner management

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help Traditional Owner groups keep a single record of obligations, agreements and decisions across multiple regimes.

UNDRIP articles 26, 27, 29, 32 · SDGs 15, 16 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Land, waters, heritage and climate · kb-039Climate justice for Country and communitiesT15bT15aT19T1T16SJR 21SJR 254 solutions

First Peoples have the smallest carbon footprint yet face some of the worst impacts of climate change, from heat and floods to rising seas threatening island homes and burial grounds. A UN committee found Australia breached its obligations to Torres Strait Islanders, and domestic legal action has not succeeded. Communities want a lead role in climate responses and adaptation.

Evidence
  • First Peoples bear some of the greatest climate impacts despite the smallest carbon footprint, on top of existing inequities including poverty for at least a third of the population. (SJR 2025, p. 481)
  • In 2022 the UN Human Rights Committee found Australia had violated its obligation to act on climate change to the detriment of Torres Strait Islanders; the government declined compensation. (SJR 2025, p. 32)
  • People described heat, floods and storms damaging land, food sources and sacred sites, and rising seas threatening island burial grounds and causing fear of relocation. (SJR 2025, p. 135)
  • Torres Strait Islander leaders' Masig Statement calls for climate action, recognition and self-determination over their islands' future. (SJR 2025, p. 136)
Solutions
Fund island and coastal adaptation

Commit long-term funding for seawalls, relocation planning led by communities and protection of cultural sites.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 135
First Nations-led climate governance

Give Traditional Owners formal roles in national and regional climate adaptation decisions.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 22
Climate-resilient housing upgrades

Prioritise First Nations housing in energy-efficient, climate-resilient social housing upgrades.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 118
Caring for Country programs

Expand ranger, fire management and seasonal knowledge programs that strengthen adaptation and transmit knowledge.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 130
Measures to track
  • Funding committed for First Nations-led climate adaptation
  • Cultural sites at risk from sea-level rise and protected
  • Ranger and caring-for-Country positions

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can host community climate observation records—photos, seasonal knowledge, site condition—under Indigenous data governance, informing adaptation planning.

UNDRIP articles 8, 25, 29, 32 · SDGs 13, 14, 15, 11 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Culture, language and healing · kb-040Language revitalisationT16T14T15bT15aSJR 164 solutions

Of at least 250 languages spoken at colonisation, around 123 were in use in 2020 and only 12 were spoken fluently across all generations. Language carries identity, Law and knowledge of Country, and revival strengthens wellbeing. Community-led revitalisation is working but needs sustained support.

Evidence
  • At colonisation there were at least 250 distinct languages and around 800 dialects; in 2020 about 123 were in use and only 12 were spoken fluently by all generations in a community. (SJR 2025, p. 348)
  • Community-led revitalisation projects, including technology-supported first language platforms, are reconnecting people to heritage. (SJR 2025, p. 350)
  • Language revival is inseparable from land justice because dispossession disrupted language transmission. (SJR 2025, p. 472)
  • Progress on the number and strength of languages spoken could not be assessed. (PC 2026, Target 16)
Solutions
Long-term funding for language centres

Fund community language centres and language workers on ongoing terms, not project grants.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Language in schools and early years

Teach local languages in schools and early learning with Traditional Owner approval and paid language teachers.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 122
Intergenerational learning on Country

Support Elders and young people to learn language together on Country.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Community-controlled language archives

Keep recordings and language resources under community ownership with cultural protocols.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Number and strength of languages spoken (PC target 16)
  • Funded language workers and centres
  • Schools teaching a local First Nations language

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga's support for audio and video makes it suitable for community-controlled language records, with access rules set by language owners as part of their ICIP.

UNDRIP articles 13, 14, 16, 31 · SDGs 4, 11 · Priority Reforms 2

Culture, language and healing · kb-041Cultural authority, nation building and restorative justiceT16T14T10T11T13SJR 16SJR 14 solutions

Colonisation fractured community cohesion, undermined Elders and displaced Indigenous Law. Communities see rebuilding cultural authority, kinship and collective responsibility as their own business, including through nation building, peacemaking and healing. Governments' role is to fund and enable, not direct.

Evidence
  • The report sets out pathways to rebuild the village through cultural revival, language, restorative justice, nation building and truth-telling. (SJR 2025, p. 27)
  • Conditions for rebuilding include self-determination, reconnection to Country and community, managing conflict through Indigenous Law and nation building for self-governance. (SJR 2025, p. 28)
  • Communities described rebuilding the village as their business, grounded in returning to values and Law and recognising everyone's role. (SJR 2025, p. 138)
  • Locally established peacemaking, community courts and law and justice groups are part of community-led efforts that have reduced offending. (SJR 2025, p. 434)
Solutions
Long-term funding for village rebuilding

Fund cultural authority, nation building, restorative justice and peacemaking, cultural camps and intergenerational learning over the long term.

Commonwealthlong termBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Recognise cultural governance in decisions

Align government decision points with Elders, Traditional Owners and community-mandated bodies.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 300
Community dispute resolution

Resource culturally grounded mediation for disputes over identity, representation and resources.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 27
Learning partnerships rather than short evaluations

Walk alongside nation-building bodies over years, building learning frameworks they own.

Kowa / Wathagalong termBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Funding for community-led cultural governance and nation-building
  • Communities with recognised local decision-making bodies
  • Restorative justice and peacemaking programs operating

How Wathaga can help. Kowa's learning-partnership model uses Wathaga to support communities to learn and do the work themselves, with support intense early and reducing over time.

UNDRIP articles 3, 4, 5, 34, 35 · SDGs 16, 11 · Priority Reforms 1, 2

Culture, language and healing · kb-042Healing and redress for Stolen Generations survivorsT14T16T12SJR 16SJR 34 solutions

Forced removal caused lasting individual and collective trauma that continues to affect descendants. Redress schemes now exist in most jurisdictions but differ widely, and one state has yet to provide formal reparations. Healing organisations call for survivor-designed redress, healing funding and support for reconnection.

Evidence
  • The Healing Foundation identified urgent actions including a survivor-informed redress scheme for living and deceased survivors and their descendants, and funding for healing. (SJR 2025, p. 346)
  • Most jurisdictions have established redress schemes with different rules and support, while Queensland had yet to provide formal reparations. (SJR 2025, p. 406)
  • Stolen Generations survivors and their descendants are more likely to be incarcerated than other First Nations people. (SJR 2025, p. 405)
  • For some survivors full reconnection may never be possible, so rebuilding must allow for different paths to belonging. (SJR 2025, p. 347)
Solutions
Close the redress gap

Establish formal reparations where none exist and harmonise schemes around survivor-designed standards.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 406
Dedicated healing funding stream

Fund healing programs designed by survivors and their organisations, including for descendants.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 346
Culturally safe aged care for survivors

Ensure survivors are not re-institutionalised by giving them priority access to culturally safe, home-based aged care.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 139
Reconnection and records support

Fund link-up and family tracing services led by First Nations organisations.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (link-up services)
Measures to track
  • Jurisdictions with a survivor redress scheme
  • Survivors receiving redress and healing support
  • Survivors in culturally safe aged care

How Wathaga can help. Healing organisations could use Wathaga to record survivor-defined healing outcomes respectfully, with strict consent and access controls.

UNDRIP articles 7, 8, 11, 40 · SDGs 16, 3 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Voice, treaty, truth and participation · kb-043A national representative voice after the 2023 referendumT17T18SJR 2SJR 84 solutions

The 2023 referendum did not pass, but communities say it did not end the need for a voice or diminish their rights. Since earlier national bodies were abolished there has been no formal national structure for First Peoples to set priorities together. Legislated bodies remain vulnerable to repeal, so independence and secure funding matter.

Evidence
  • The referendum result was 39.94% Yes and 60.06% No. (SJR 2025, p. 102)
  • There is no formal national structure for collective First Nations engagement on priorities; previous bodies included ATSIC and the National Congress of Australia's First Peoples. (SJR 2025, p. 21)
  • The report argues a national representative mechanism is needed to carry forward Voice, Treaty and Truth and to provide the independent accountability called for in Closing the Gap. (SJR 2025, p. 205)
  • Even legislated funding for state representative bodies is vulnerable when political will changes. (SJR 2025, p. 187)
Solutions
Co-design an independent national representative body

Establish a representative mechanism with First Peoples, independent of government on the Paris Principles model.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 2
Secure funding through an endowment

Fund the body from a future-fund style endowment so it is not dependent on annual budgets.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 2
Strengthen regional and local voices

Support state, regional and local representative structures that feed national priorities.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (regional representative bodies)
Community-controlled engagement records

Help representative bodies hold and report community input transparently.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Existence of an independent, legislated national representative body
  • Representative body funding source and term
  • Government responses to the body's advice published

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can give representative bodies a transparent record of community input and of how governments respond, reinforcing accountability.

UNDRIP articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 19 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 1

Voice, treaty, truth and participation · kb-044Makarrata Commission and national truth-tellingT18T16T15bT15aSJR 3SJR 44 solutions

The Commonwealth committed to a Makarrata Commission for truth-telling and agreement-making but has not delivered it. Communities are pursuing local truth-telling, sometimes in fear after state processes were dismantled. A national process should be First Peoples-led, linked to justice and redress, and paired with public education and healing.

Evidence
  • Despite commitments and budget funding for a Makarrata Commission, the Australian Government had not delivered it. (SJR 2025, p. 204)
  • The report sets out that national truth-telling should be legislated, First Peoples-led, culturally safe, coupled to redress, linked to public education and underpinned by data sovereignty. (SJR 2025, p. 205)
  • No dedicated funding supported First Peoples to heal from racism during the referendum. (SJR 2025, p. 205)
  • Elders in one community planned to continue local truth-telling after the state process was repealed, though they feared police intervention. (SJR 2025, p. 108)
Solutions
Establish the Makarrata Commission

Create a Makarrata Commission with the powers to run national truth-telling and design agreement-making.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 3
Public education alongside truth-telling

Fund public awareness on First Peoples' rights and the ongoing effects of colonisation, run in parallel to the national process.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 4
Healing investment for truth-telling

Fund healing support for participants and communities throughout truth-telling.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 205
Local truth-telling projects

Support community-led truth-telling, records research and memorials.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 203
Measures to track
  • Makarrata Commission established and funded
  • Local truth-telling projects supported
  • Public understanding of First Nations history (reconciliation surveys)

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help communities hold testimonies, records and media from local truth-telling under their own protocols and data sovereignty.

UNDRIP articles 8, 11, 15, 28, 37, 40 · SDGs 16, 4 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Voice, treaty, truth and participation · kb-045Treaty processes in the states and territoriesT17T15bT15aT16SJR 3SJR 23 solutions

Victoria passed a statewide treaty law and signed a treaty in late 2025, showing what sustained processes can achieve. Elsewhere, processes have stalled or been repealed, as in Queensland in 2024, while NSW has begun engagement. Communities see treaty as the ultimate goal but doubt governments will keep commitments without legal safeguards.

Evidence
  • Victoria's Statewide Treaty Act passed on 30 October 2025 and the treaty was signed on 13 November 2025. (SJR 2025, p. 189)
  • Queensland's Path to Treaty process reached phase 4 of 5 before the incoming government repealed its enabling law in late 2024. (SJR 2025, p. 191)
  • NSW appointed Treaty Commissioners to run a 12-month engagement process with Aboriginal communities. (SJR 2025, p. 192)
  • Communities called treaty the ultimate goal but questioned whether governments would negotiate and deliver in good faith. (SJR 2025, p. 108)
Solutions
Entrench treaty processes in law

Protect treaty bodies and agreements with legal safeguards that make repeal difficult.

States and territorieslong termBasis: sjr2025 p. 191
National agreement-making framework

Use the Makarrata Commission to design a national framework supporting state and regional treaties.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 3
Resource community readiness

Fund nations and communities to prepare, organise and negotiate on equal terms.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 108
Measures to track
  • Jurisdictions with an active, legislated treaty process
  • Treaties or agreements signed
  • Funding for First Nations negotiating capacity

How Wathaga can help. Treaty bodies could use Wathaga to monitor treaty commitments with indicators set by their communities.

UNDRIP articles 3, 18, 19, 37 · SDGs 16 · Priority Reforms 1

Voice, treaty, truth and participation · kb-046Free, prior and informed consent and a participation dutyT17T15bT15aSJR 7SJR 134 solutions

Australia's democratic processes do not reliably ensure First Peoples are heard, and major policies such as the NT Intervention and cashless debit card were imposed without adequate consultation. FPIC requires that people can say yes or no, with full information and time, through institutions they choose. A legislated participation duty would make this standard practice.

Evidence
  • The report sets out FPIC as free from pressure, sought before activity starts, fully informed and respecting the right to say yes or no through chosen institutions. (SJR 2025, p. 172)
  • A participation duty would legally require public authorities to involve affected people in designing, implementing, monitoring and evaluating decisions that affect their rights. (SJR 2025, p. 173)
  • The NT Intervention, the 2015 remote employment program and the cashless debit card are cited as policies imposed without adequate consultation. (SJR 2025, p. 174)
Solutions
Legislate a participation duty

Include a duty in a national Human Rights Act requiring meaningful participation and FPIC, grounded in UNDRIP articles 18 and 19.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 174
FPIC records as a precondition

Require a completed FPIC record and joint risk register before programs affecting First Peoples are approved.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 301
Interpreters and independent advice

Fund interpreters and independent legal advice for communities in consultations.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 172
Track consent and influence

Help communities record what they were asked, what they said and how decisions changed.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Laws and programs with a documented FPIC process
  • Existence of a legislated participation duty

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga already applies FPIC to data collection; it can extend this to record consultation and consent decisions, making influence on decisions visible.

UNDRIP articles 18, 19, 32 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 3

Voice, treaty, truth and participation · kb-047First Peoples in domestic and international human rights forumsT17T7SJR 8SJR 73 solutions

UN mechanisms give First Peoples a direct way to raise concerns, and many UN review recommendations to Australia relate to First Peoples. Participation is supported by some funding but barriers remain, especially for young advocates. The report recommends funding self-determined participation and a human rights network.

Evidence
  • As of January 2026, 234 of 1,122 Universal Periodic Review recommendations to Australia related to First Peoples. (SJR 2025, p. 24)
  • Support such as UN voluntary funds and DFAT fellowships has helped more representatives attend UN meetings, but barriers remain. (SJR 2025, p. 174)
  • In the absence of domestic remedies, international complaints are often the only recourse for First Peoples. (SJR 2025, p. 421)
Solutions
Fund self-determined participation

Fund First Peoples to take part in domestic and international human rights forums on their own terms.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 8
Resource an Indigenous Human Rights Network

Provide ongoing funding for a network linking advocates and communities.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 8
Train young advocates

Support youth human rights training and mentoring led by First Nations organisations.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 8
Measures to track
  • First Nations delegates funded to attend UN mechanisms
  • Young advocates trained

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can help advocates assemble community evidence for international reporting, while communities keep ownership of their data.

UNDRIP articles 5, 18, 41, 42 · SDGs 16, 17 · Priority Reforms 1

Human rights and anti-racism · kb-048A national Human Rights ActT18T10T11SJR 7SJR 133 solutions

Australia has no national human rights law, so protections are inconsistent, fragile and easy to override. Compatibility statements are often weak and some jurisdictions have removed or knowingly overridden rights protections. A Human Rights Act would require government to act compatibly with rights and give people a remedy when they are breached.

Evidence
  • Without a national framework and legislation, First Peoples face inconsistent recognition of rights and limited remedies, and existing protections can be overridden by parliaments. (SJR 2025, p. 23)
  • Statements of compatibility are often of poor quality and do not require assessment against UNDRIP; a Human Rights Act would oblige agencies to consider and act compatibly with rights. (SJR 2025, p. 422)
  • One state introduced youth justice laws with a statement expressly acknowledging they were incompatible with children's rights. (SJR 2025, p. 413)
  • In late 2024 the NT Parliament removed the requirement for human rights compatibility statements with new bills. (SJR 2025, p. 298)
Solutions
Enact a federal Human Rights Act

Implement the Free and Equal recommendations including a Human Rights Act with a participation duty and access to remedies.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 7
Human rights education plan

Deliver a national human rights education plan for public servants and the community.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 7
Restore and strengthen state protections

Reinstate compatibility statements where removed and limit override powers.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 298
Measures to track
  • Federal Human Rights Act in force
  • Bills with compatibility statements assessing UNDRIP
  • Laws passed with declared incompatibility or override

How Wathaga can help. Communities could use Wathaga to document rights impacts of laws in their area, building evidence for compatibility scrutiny and legal remedies.

UNDRIP articles 1, 38, 40, 43 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 3

Human rights and anti-racism · kb-049Implementing UNDRIP in law and policyT17T18SJR 7SJR 13SJR 14 solutions

Australia endorsed UNDRIP in 2009 but has not built it into law, and has been criticised for using rights language without acting on it. Parliamentary inquiries recommended a national plan and changes to scrutiny law, but these have not been actioned. Communities want UNDRIP implemented with consequences and a monitoring framework.

Evidence
  • Parliamentary inquiries reporting in November 2023 and May 2024 recommended stronger rights protections and UNDRIP implementation, but recommendations had not been responded to. (SJR 2025, p. 24)
  • Communities called for UNDRIP to be embedded in legislation with enforceable consequences. (SJR 2025, p. 99)
  • Participants called for an audit of all laws against UNDRIP and supported adding UNDRIP to the definition of human rights in federal scrutiny law. (SJR 2025, p. 101)
  • The report describes rights ritualism: endorsing rights in principle while resisting the changes they require. (SJR 2025, p. 297)
Solutions
National UNDRIP action plan

Develop and fund a national plan with First Peoples, aligned with Closing the Gap, with monitoring and reporting.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 7
UNDRIP test for Cabinet and Parliament

Require every legislative, policy and program proposal to show alignment with obligations to First Peoples including UNDRIP.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 13
Amend scrutiny legislation

Add UNDRIP to the human rights definition in federal parliamentary scrutiny law.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 101
Organisations adopting UNDRIP

Embed UNDRIP in governance, partnership protocols and reconciliation plans.

Philanthropy and businessnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 100
Measures to track
  • National UNDRIP plan adopted and funded
  • Cabinet submissions assessed against UNDRIP
  • Laws audited against UNDRIP

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga's mapping of outcomes to UNDRIP articles can help organisations and communities report practical UNDRIP implementation.

UNDRIP articles 38, 42, 43 · SDGs 16 · Priority Reforms 3

Human rights and anti-racism · kb-050Ending racism: the National Anti-Racism FrameworkT18T14SJR 14SJR 4SJR 204 solutions

More than half of First Nations people report recent racism, up sharply over a decade, and the referendum period saw a surge of abuse. Racism harms mental health and limits access to services, work and justice. The Commission released a National Anti-Racism Framework in 2024, which communities want governments to adopt.

Evidence
  • In the 2024 Reconciliation Barometer, 54% of First Nations people reported experiencing racism in the previous six months, up from 39% in 2014. (SJR 2025, p. 198)
  • Nearly one in five reports to a national racism register over 2023–24 linked the abuse to the referendum. (SJR 2025, p. 198)
  • People said making a racism complaint can be costly, for example in sport, and called for real consequences rather than apologies. (SJR 2025, p. 97)
  • The Commission released the National Anti-Racism Framework in 2024 after consultation with First Peoples and other communities. (SJR 2025, p. 308)
  • The framework calls for external audits of institutions, a positive duty to prevent racism and mandatory measures. (SJR 2025, p. 307)
Solutions
Adopt and implement the National Anti-Racism Framework

Accept the framework and fund implementation across Commonwealth agencies.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 14
Positive duty to prevent racism

Introduce a positive duty under the Racial Discrimination Act and external institutional audits.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 307
Free, culturally safe complaint support

Fund legal help and counselling for people who experience racism, and remove complaint fees.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 98
Anti-racism plans in organisations

Businesses, sport bodies and services adopt anti-racism and cultural safety standards with public reporting.

Philanthropy and businessnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 98
Measures to track
  • First Nations people reporting racism in last six months
  • Institutions with an independent anti-racism audit
  • Racism complaints lodged and resolved

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can support community racism reporting and institutional audits with community-set indicators, while protecting people who report.

UNDRIP articles 2, 8, 15, 16 · SDGs 10, 16 · Priority Reforms 3

Human rights and anti-racism · kb-051Accurate and responsible media reportingT11T18SJR 204 solutions

Media coverage of youth crime often sensationalises and racialises offending, leaves out young people's voices and omits data showing crime falling in some places. This coverage feeds punitive law changes. Communities want media rules and training that support accurate, respectful reporting.

Evidence
  • A study of 173 news articles from early 2023 found coverage overwhelmingly pushed for harsher punishment, with young people's voices absent. (SJR 2025, p. 412)
  • Reporting often frames youth offending as an Indigenous problem rather than a consequence of structural inequality affecting all communities. (SJR 2025, p. 435)
  • Crisis reporting often omits data showing that youth crime and recidivism are falling in some jurisdictions and that a small group accounts for much offending. (SJR 2025, p. 436)
  • Communities called for greater media regulation and profiling of positive stories to challenge deficit views. (SJR 2025, p. 143)
Solutions
Youth Justice Media Code of Practice

The Communications Minister works with First Nations media, the regulator, the Press Council, the journalists' union and eSafety to create a dedicated code.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 20
Mandatory training for justice reporters

Require training on the code for journalists covering youth justice.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 20
Fund First Nations media

Strengthen First Nations-controlled media to tell community stories.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (First Nations media sector)
Accessible data for journalists

Publish clear, community-endorsed data stories that journalists can use.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: sjr2025 p. 436
Measures to track
  • Media complaints upheld relating to First Nations reporting
  • Journalists trained under a youth justice code

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can publish community-endorsed data summaries that give journalists accurate, strengths-based context.

UNDRIP articles 15, 16 · SDGs 16, 10 · Priority Reforms 3

Accountability, funding and data sovereignty · kb-052Closing the Gap accountability and independent oversightT17SJR 9SJR 15SJR 15 solutions

Five years into the National Agreement only a handful of targets are on track and several are going backwards. Reviews found public sector accountability badly lacking, with responsibility shifted between levels of government, and decades of inquiry recommendations remain unimplemented. Communities are tired of retelling their stories and want transparent, independent tracking of what governments promised.

Evidence
  • Only 4 of 19 targets were on track five years into the National Agreement, with some going backwards. (SJR 2025, p. 110)
  • There had been little movement on Priority Reform 3 or the independent monitoring mechanism committed to under the Agreement. (SJR 2025, p. 111)
  • Reviews by the Productivity Commission and Jumbunna Institute found public sector accountability severely lacking, with responsibility handballed across the federation. (SJR 2025, p. 26)
  • Communities asked for dashboards or community scorecards showing what has been promised, what is underway and what remains. (SJR 2025, p. 127)
  • Most recommendations from decades of royal commissions, inquiries and reviews remain only partially implemented or unaddressed. (SJR 2025, p. 292)
  • Governments have routinely ignored or selectively responded to Social Justice Commissioner recommendations; the report seeks a formal public response. (SJR 2025, p. 15)
Solutions
Establish the independent mechanism

Prioritise the long-overdue independent accountability mechanism under the National Agreement.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 286
Observer status for the Social Justice Commissioner

Give the Commissioner formal observer status in Closing the Gap partnership structures.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 9
Rights-based performance requirements

Build performance requirements tied to UNDRIP, the Priority Reforms and targets into Commonwealth funding agreements with states.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 15
Formal government response to every report

Respond publicly and on time to Social Justice and inquiry reports, stating which recommendations are accepted, how they will be implemented and how progress will be measured.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 15
Community scorecards and a recommendations register

Support communities to publish their own scorecards on local Closing the Gap commitments and to track the status of past inquiry recommendations.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: sjr2025 p. 127
Measures to track
  • Targets on track (PC dashboard)
  • Priority Reform 3 indicators
  • Independent mechanism operating in each jurisdiction
  • Reports receiving a formal government response within six months

How Wathaga can help. This is Wathaga's core use: a community-facing scorecard that links commitments, targets and community-defined measures, so accountability runs to communities.

UNDRIP articles 18, 38, 40, 42 · SDGs 16, 17 · Priority Reforms 1, 3, 4

Accountability, funding and data sovereignty · kb-053Transparent audits of Indigenous expenditureT17SJR 11SJR 103 solutions

Most spending on First Nations people flows through mainstream programs and non-Indigenous providers, with little transparency about outcomes. Calls to audit spending have often targeted cultural practices rather than the full budget. A meaningful audit would test returns on both Indigenous-specific and mainstream spending against community priorities.

Evidence
  • In 2015–16 governments spent about $33.4 billion on First Nations people, around 6% of national spending, of which $6 billion was Indigenous-specific and $27.4 billion the Indigenous share of mainstream programs. (SJR 2025, p. 287)
  • Audits have too often focused on cultural practices rather than Treasury and Cabinet decisions and the whole of spending. (SJR 2025, p. 287)
  • Proposals for a new royal commission costing at least $50 million focused on about $450,000 spent on Welcome to Country, rather than acting on what existing expenditure reports already show. (SJR 2025, p. 292)
  • The report proposes annual Indigenous Expenditure Reports tabled in Parliament with recommendations acted on. (SJR 2025, p. 310)
Solutions
Independent financial and performance audits

Audit Indigenous-specific and mainstream expenditure against Closing the Gap commitments and community priorities.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 11
Annual Indigenous Expenditure Report to Parliament

Produce and table expenditure reports every year with a government response.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 310
Regional spend transparency

Publish spending by region so communities can see what reaches them.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 128
Measures to track
  • Publication of annual Indigenous expenditure reports
  • Share of spending delivered through community-controlled organisations

How Wathaga can help. Communities could combine regional spending data with local outcomes in Wathaga to test value for money on their own terms.

UNDRIP articles 38, 39 · SDGs 16, 17 · Priority Reforms 1, 3, 4

Accountability, funding and data sovereignty · kb-054Needs-based, long-term funding for ACCOsT17SJR 10SJR 164 solutions

Community-controlled organisations deliver across every outcome but are funded through short, competitive, target-based grants that rarely include evaluation. Small ACCOs struggle to compete with large mainstream providers, and heavy reporting diverts time from services. A national framework with needs-based, direct, long-term funding is recommended.

Evidence
  • ACCOs report that funding formulas neither realise rights nor support targets, and that short-term, inadequate cycles burden them. (SJR 2025, p. 287)
  • Funding rarely provides or sustains monitoring and evaluation, and small ACCOs lack capacity to write competitive proposals. (SJR 2025, p. 288)
  • The report calls for long-term, flexible, indexed, full-cost-recovery funding proportionate to need and an end to pilot churn. (SJR 2025, p. 300)
  • Communities said funding is often short-term and goes to larger mainstream organisations not accountable to local people. (SJR 2025, p. 128)
Solutions
National framework for Indigenous services expenditure

Co-design a framework that replaces short-term grants with needs-based, direct, long-term funding for ACCOs, including evaluation capacity.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Enabling clauses in funding deeds

Include flexibility, indexation and realistic reporting, and report government's own obligations publicly.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 301
Priority for community-controlled providers

Apply ACCO preference in commissioning as committed under Priority Reform 2.

States and territoriesnowBasis: evaluation evidence (Priority Reform 2 commitments)
Philanthropy funding core and evaluation costs

Fund ACCO core operations, governance and self-led evaluation with flexible multi-year grants.

Philanthropy and business1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (trust-based philanthropy)
Measures to track
  • Share of First Nations-specific funding to ACCOs
  • Average funding agreement length for ACCOs
  • ACCO funding agreements that include evaluation resources

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga lowers the cost of reporting by letting ACCOs collect data once, in their own frameworks, and generate reports for several funders.

UNDRIP articles 4, 21, 39 · SDGs 17, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 1

Accountability, funding and data sovereignty · kb-055Indigenous data sovereigntyT17SJR 124 solutions

When governments control the collection, interpretation and release of data they decide what is measured and whose views count. Indigenous data sovereignty asserts First Peoples' right to govern data about them, their lands and their knowledge. Current federal guidance is welcome but not binding and does not reach states or service providers.

Evidence
  • Government control of data means First Peoples are monitored while governments escape equivalent scrutiny. (SJR 2025, p. 294)
  • Maiam nayri Wingara principles affirm rights to control data, define relevance and interpretation, and hold data users accountable to Indigenous governance. (SJR 2025, p. 295)
  • The federal Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data is guidance, not binding, and does not extend to states, territories or non-government holders. (SJR 2025, p. 295)
  • A community-designed national longitudinal study shows how research on First Peoples' own terms can quantify cultural determinants of wellbeing. (SJR 2025, p. 296)
Solutions
Binding data agreements across governments

Implement binding data-sharing and governance agreements that uphold Indigenous data sovereignty, with accountability measures set by communities.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 12
Regional data access for communities

Give communities access to regional data and the capability to use it under Priority Reform 4.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 12
Apply IDS principles in every project

Seek FPIC for data, make data accessible to its owners, allow withdrawal, and protect cultural and intellectual property.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Community data governance frameworks

Support communities to adopt their own data governance, such as Kowa's OCCAAARS framework, adapted locally.

ACCOs and communities1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Binding data agreements in place across jurisdictions
  • Communities with regional data access (Priority Reform 4)
  • Organisations with an adopted Indigenous data governance framework

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga is built for Indigenous data sovereignty: communities own and control their data, can export or remove it, and decide who sees what.

UNDRIP articles 3, 18, 19, 31 · SDGs 17, 16 · Priority Reforms 4

Accountability, funding and data sovereignty · kb-056Community-led measurement, evaluation and learningT17SJR 10SJR 124 solutions

ACCOs face heavy evaluation and reporting while government performance is rarely evaluated, and evaluation money is seldom provided. Communities want monitoring and evaluation that is transparent, culturally informed and centres their right to define success. First Nations-led co-creation and long-term learning partnerships offer a different model.

Evidence
  • Significant effort goes into evaluating First Nations organisations while systemic evaluation of government performance is absent. (SJR 2025, p. 291)
  • Communities said government self-reporting is not enough and that monitoring and evaluation must centre First Peoples' right to define success. (SJR 2025, p. 128)
  • A consortium of seven ACCOs co-designed a culturally led governance model and a monitoring and evaluation framework to track progress against community goals. (SJR 2025, p. 117)
  • Funding agreements rarely provide or sustain monitoring and evaluation to assess outcomes. (SJR 2025, p. 288)
Solutions
Fund evaluation capacity in ACCO agreements

Include dedicated resources for community-led monitoring and evaluation in every ACCO funding agreement.

CommonwealthnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 10
Evaluate government performance

Independently evaluate agencies against the Priority Reforms with communities defining the questions.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 291
First Nations-led co-creation of frameworks

Co-create theories of change, logic models and indicators drawn from collective community knowledge, rather than imposing outside frameworks.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Learning partnerships and confidence acceleration

Replace short project evaluations with multi-year learning partnerships that employ local people in evaluation roles and leave skills in community.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • ACCOs with a community-owned MEL framework
  • Local First Nations people employed in evaluation roles
  • Evaluations of government agencies against Priority Reforms

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga and Kowa's UMEL approach put measurement, evaluation and learning in community hands—from theory of change and signals of change to baselines and learning cycles.

UNDRIP articles 3, 18, 23, 31 · SDGs 17, 16 · Priority Reforms 2, 4, 3

Women, Elders, young people and LGBTIQA+ mob · kb-057Women's voices, leadership and unpaid careT13T8T10T17SJR 16SJR 104 solutions

First Nations women carry much of the caring, cultural and community work, often unpaid and invisible in policy and economic measures. They face high rates of violence and imprisonment and lead many of the solutions. The Wiyi Yani U Thangani work set out women's priorities, and its findings are echoed in this report.

Evidence
  • Community life in many places depends on the unpaid labour of women, especially grandmothers, whose contributions go unrecognised. (SJR 2025, p. 125)
  • Much of what communities said about work and caring reflects the Wiyi Yani U Thangani (Women's Voices) report. (SJR 2025, p. 126)
  • The Wiyi Yani U Thangani report and the Productivity Commission both found government risk aversion limits community leadership while communities carry the risks. (SJR 2025, p. 300)
  • First Nations women are the fastest-growing prison population. (SJR 2025, p. 398)
Solutions
Implement Wiyi Yani U Thangani priorities

Fund women-led initiatives and structures that carry forward the women's voices agenda.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 126
Value unpaid caring work

Recognise kinship and grandparent care through carer payments and support.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 125
Women's leadership in decision-making

Guarantee women's representation in partnership and representative structures.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 173
Measure unpaid and cultural work

Co-design measures that make women's caring and cultural work visible in evaluation.

Kowa / Wathaga1–3 yearsBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Kinship and grandparent carers receiving financial support
  • Women in First Nations representative and partnership structures
  • Community-defined measures of women's caring and cultural work

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can capture work that standard indicators miss, helping women's organisations show the real value of unpaid and cultural labour.

UNDRIP articles 21, 22, 44 · SDGs 5, 8, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 2

Women, Elders, young people and LGBTIQA+ mob · kb-058Elders, ageing and culturally safe aged careT1T14T16T17SJR 164 solutions

Elders are cultural authorities and carers, often doing unpaid work in justice groups, courts and child care while supporting grandchildren. Yet their voices are missing from decision-making and Closing the Gap targets, which focus on life expectancy rather than quality of life. Survivors of institutions fear being institutionalised again in aged care.

Evidence
  • Communities raised the lack of Elder voices in decision-making in every consultation. (SJR 2025, p. 138)
  • Elders sit on justice groups and community courts, visit people in prison and care for grandchildren, often unpaid. (SJR 2025, p. 139)
  • Participants said Elders are missing from Closing the Gap, whose measures look at life expectancy but not quality of life or cultural connection. (SJR 2025, p. 139)
  • Elders raised in institutions fear being institutionalised again and asked for safer, culturally supportive aged care. (SJR 2025, p. 139)
Solutions
Culturally safe aged care led by communities

Fund ACCO-run home and residential aged care that supports ageing on Country.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 139
Elder voice in decisions

Create formal roles and paid sitting fees for Elders in local and regional decision-making.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 138
Add Elder wellbeing to Closing the Gap measures

Develop quality-of-life and cultural connection measures for older people with Elders.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 139
Intergenerational programs

Support Elders and young people to share knowledge and spend time on Country together.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 rec 16
Measures to track
  • First Nations people 50+ receiving culturally safe aged care
  • Elders in paid community decision-making roles
  • Elder-defined quality-of-life indicators

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can record Elders' guidance and Elder-defined wellbeing measures, giving them visibility that national targets currently lack.

UNDRIP articles 21, 22, 24 · SDGs 3, 10 · Priority Reforms 1, 2, 3

Women, Elders, young people and LGBTIQA+ mob · kb-059Sistergirls, Brotherboys and LGBTIQA+ mobT14T1T10T18SJR 14SJR 164 solutions

First Nations LGBTIQA+ people, including Sistergirls and Brotherboys, face racism and queerphobia together, with serious effects on mental health. They are over-represented in prisons and can be excluded from services that are not safe for them. Affirming, community-controlled services make a real difference.

Evidence
  • In a national survey of First Nations LGBTIQA+ young people, 45.4% had attempted suicide in their lifetime and 92% reported high psychological distress. (SJR 2025, p. 113)
  • Without safe services, LGBTIQA+ mob are more likely to be excluded, and organisations cannot gather health information if services are unsafe for them. (SJR 2025, p. 120)
  • LGBTIQA+ people are over-represented in prisons and face higher levels of discrimination, violence and trauma there. (SJR 2025, p. 399)
  • A gay Aboriginal man described positive experiences at ACCHOs where women and aunties actively support rainbow mob. (SJR 2025, p. 117)
Solutions
Fund LGBTIQA+ First Nations-led services

Fund community-controlled, affirming wellbeing and peer support led by Sistergirls, Brotherboys and LGBTIQA+ mob.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 113
Affirming practice in ACCOs and mainstream services

Train staff to address homophobia and transphobia and make services visibly safe.

ACCOs and communitiesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 120
Safe custodial settings

Introduce enforceable protections and gender-affirming health care for LGBTIQA+ people in custody.

States and territories1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 p. 400
Safe, consent-based data collection

Collect sexuality and gender data only under community governance and with strong privacy.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Psychological distress among First Nations LGBTIQA+ young people
  • Services with LGBTIQA+-affirming accreditation
  • Funding for LGBTIQA+ First Nations-led organisations

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga's community-controlled access settings allow LGBTIQA+ mob to share experiences safely, informing services without exposing individuals.

UNDRIP articles 2, 21, 24 · SDGs 3, 5, 10 · Priority Reforms 2, 3

Women, Elders, young people and LGBTIQA+ mob · kb-060Young people as leaders and decision-makersT7T11T14SJR 8SJR 18SJR 54 solutions

Every community expressed deep concern for young people's wellbeing and called for them to grow up strong in culture, with safe homes, family support and culturally grounded education and health care. Young people want to lead and to be included in decisions about their futures. Youth with lived experience of the justice system say locking up children takes them away from everything they value.

Evidence
  • Communities shared deep concern for young people and named safe housing, family support, culturally grounded education and help for children who learn differently as priorities. (SJR 2025, p. 139)
  • Communities want young people included in discussions about their futures, especially where they will be expected to step into leadership. (SJR 2025, p. 138)
  • Young people with lived experience told a youth-led project that the justice system is failing them and that detention cuts them off from family, culture and Country. (SJR 2025, p. 417)
  • Governments are urged to treat young Aboriginal people as the solution and involve those with lived experience in decision-making. (SJR 2025, p. 430)
Solutions
Youth advisory and decision roles

Establish funded youth councils with real influence in justice, education and Closing the Gap partnerships.

States and territoriesnowBasis: sjr2025 p. 138
Train and support young advocates

Fund leadership and human rights training for young people through First Nations organisations.

Commonwealth1–3 yearsBasis: sjr2025 rec 8
Youth-led programs on Country

Back youth-designed cultural, sporting and mentoring programs with multi-year funding.

Philanthropy and business1–3 yearsBasis: evaluation evidence (youth mentoring and on-Country programs)
Youth-led evaluation

Train young people as evaluators of the programs that affect them.

Kowa / WathaganowBasis: ciet
Measures to track
  • Youth representatives on Closing the Gap and justice partnership bodies
  • Youth engagement in work or study (PC target 7)
  • Youth-defined wellbeing indicators

How Wathaga can help. Wathaga can support youth-led evaluation, letting young people tell their stories through video and photo and define what success looks like.

UNDRIP articles 17, 21, 22 · SDGs 4, 8, 16 · Priority Reforms 1, 2

Download the data

Summaries and solutions are Wathaga paraphrases with page references; they are not the Commission's words. Kowa practice content is limited to published method principles. Review before quoting.